Fix failed tests checks in core_reloc test runner, which allowed failing tests
to pass quietly. Also add extra check to make sure that expected to fail test cases with
invalid names are caught as test failure anyway, as this is not an expected
failure mode. Also fix mislabeled probed vs direct bitfield test cases.
Fixes: 124a892d1c ("selftests/bpf: Test TYPE_EXISTS and TYPE_SIZE CO-RE relocations")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-6-andrii@kernel.org
Negative field existence cases for have a broken assumption that FIELD_EXISTS
CO-RE relo will fail for fields that match the name but have incompatible type
signature. That's not how CO-RE relocations generally behave. Types and fields
that match by name but not by expected type are treated as non-matching
candidates and are skipped. Error later is reported if no matching candidate
was found. That's what happens for most relocations, but existence relocations
(FIELD_EXISTS and TYPE_EXISTS) are more permissive and they are designed to
return 0 or 1, depending if a match is found. This allows to handle
name-conflicting but incompatible types in BPF code easily. Combined with
___flavor suffixes, it's possible to handle pretty much any structural type
changes in kernel within the compiled once BPF source code.
So, long story short, negative field existence test cases are invalid in their
assumptions, so this patch reworks them into a single consolidated positive
case that doesn't match any of the fields.
Fixes: c7566a6969 ("selftests/bpf: Add field existence CO-RE relocs tests")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-5-andrii@kernel.org
Add ASSERT_TRUE/ASSERT_FALSE for conditions calculated with custom logic to
true/false. Also add remaining arithmetical assertions:
- ASSERT_LE -- less than or equal;
- ASSERT_GT -- greater than;
- ASSERT_GE -- greater than or equal.
This should cover most scenarios where people fall back to error-prone
CHECK()s.
Also extend ASSERT_ERR() to print out errno, in addition to direct error.
Also convert few CHECK() instances to ensure new ASSERT_xxx() variants work as
expected. Subsequent patch will also use ASSERT_TRUE/ASSERT_FALSE more
extensively.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-2-andrii@kernel.org
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-04-23
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 69 non-merge commits during the last 22 day(s) which contain
a total of 69 files changed, 3141 insertions(+), 866 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add BPF static linker support for extern resolution of global, from Andrii.
2) Refine retval for bpf_get_task_stack helper, from Dave.
3) Add a bpf_snprintf helper, from Florent.
4) A bunch of miscellaneous improvements from many developers.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add selftest validating various aspects of statically linking BTF-defined map
definitions. Legacy map definitions do not support extern resolution between
object files. Some of the aspects validated:
- correct resolution of extern maps against concrete map definitions;
- extern maps can currently only specify map type and key/value size and/or
type information;
- weak concrete map definitions are resolved properly.
Static map definitions are not yet supported by libbpf, so they are not
explicitly tested, though manual testing showes that BPF linker handles them
properly.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210423181348.1801389-18-andrii@kernel.org
Add selftest validating various aspects of statically linking functions:
- no conflicts and correct resolution for name-conflicting static funcs;
- correct resolution of extern functions;
- correct handling of weak functions, both resolution itself and libbpf's
handling of unused weak function that "lost" (it leaves gaps in code with
no ELF symbols);
- correct handling of hidden visibility to turn global function into
"static" for the purpose of BPF verification.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210423181348.1801389-16-andrii@kernel.org
With clang compiler:
make -j60 LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1 <=== compile kernel
make -j60 -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf LLVM=1 LLVM_IAS=1
Some linker flags are not used/effective for some binaries and
we have warnings like:
warning: -lelf: 'linker' input unused [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
We also have warnings like:
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ns_current_pid_tgid.c:74:57: note: treat the string as an argument to avoid this
if (CHECK(waitpid(cpid, &wstatus, 0) == -1, "waitpid", strerror(errno)))
^
"%s",
.../selftests/bpf/test_progs.h:129:35: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK'
_CHECK(condition, tag, duration, format)
^
.../selftests/bpf/test_progs.h:108:21: note: expanded from macro '_CHECK'
fprintf(stdout, ##format); \
^
The first warning can be silenced with clang option -Wno-unused-command-line-argument.
For the second warning, source codes are modified as suggested by the compiler
to silence the warning. Since gcc does not support the option
-Wno-unused-command-line-argument and the warning only happens with clang
compiler, the option -Wno-unused-command-line-argument is enabled only when
clang compiler is used.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210413153429.3029377-1-yhs@fb.com
Extend the fexit_bpf2bpf test to check that the info for the bpf_link
returned by the kernel matches the expected values.
While we're updating the test, change existing uses of CHEC() to use the
much easier to read ASSERT_*() macros.
v2:
- Convert last CHECK() call and get rid of 'duration' var
- Split ASSERT_OK_PTR() checks to two separate if statements
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210413091607.58945-2-toke@redhat.com
Conflicts:
MAINTAINERS
- keep Chandrasekar
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
- simple fix + trust the code re-added to param.c in -next is fine
include/linux/bpf.h
- trivial
include/linux/ethtool.h
- trivial, fix kdoc while at it
include/linux/skmsg.h
- move to relevant place in tcp.c, comment re-wrapped
net/core/skmsg.c
- add the sk = sk // sk = NULL around calls
net/tipc/crypto.c
- trivial
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This patch adds a few kernel function bpf_kfunc_call_test*() for the
selftest's test_run purpose. They will be allowed for tc_cls prog.
The selftest calling the kernel function bpf_kfunc_call_test*()
is also added in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210325015252.1551395-1-kafai@fb.com
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2021-03-24
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 37 non-merge commits during the last 15 day(s) which contain
a total of 65 files changed, 3200 insertions(+), 738 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Static linking of multiple BPF ELF files, from Andrii.
2) Move drop error path to devmap for XDP_REDIRECT, from Lorenzo.
3) Spelling fixes from various folks.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add Makefile infra to specify multi-file BPF object files (and derivative
skeletons). Add first selftest validating BPF static linker can merge together
successfully two independent BPF object files and resulting object and
skeleton are correct and usable.
Use the same F(F(F(X))) = F(F(X)) identity test on linked object files as for
the case of single BPF object files.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210318194036.3521577-13-andrii@kernel.org
When testing uprobes we the test gets GEP (Global Entry Point)
address from kallsyms, but then the function is called locally
so the uprobe is not triggered.
Fixing this by adjusting the address to LEP (Local Entry Point)
for powerpc arch plus instruction check stolen from ppc_function_entry
function pointed out and explained by Michael and Naveen.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210305134050.139840-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Convert the selftests for sk_lookup narrow context access to use
PROG_TEST_RUN instead of creating actual sockets. This ensures that
ctx is populated correctly when using PROG_TEST_RUN.
Assert concrete values since we now control remote_ip and remote_port.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-4-lmb@cloudflare.com
The original bcc pull request https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/pull/3270 exposed
a verifier failure with Clang 12/13 while Clang 4 works fine.
Further investigation exposed two issues:
Issue 1: LLVM may generate code which uses less refined value. The issue is
fixed in LLVM patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97479
Issue 2: Spills with initial value 0 are marked as precise which makes later
state pruning less effective. This is my rough initial analysis and
further investigation is needed to find how to improve verifier
pruning in such cases.
With the above LLVM patch, for the new loop6.c test, which has smaller loop
bound compared to original test, I got:
$ test_progs -s -n 10/16
...
stack depth 64
processed 390735 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 87
total_states 8658 peak_states 964 mark_read 6
#10/16 loop6.o:OK
Use the original loop bound, i.e., commenting out "#define WORKAROUND", I got:
$ test_progs -s -n 10/16
...
BPF program is too large. Processed 1000001 insn
stack depth 64
processed 1000001 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 91
total_states 23176 peak_states 5069 mark_read 6
...
#10/16 loop6.o:FAIL
The purpose of this patch is to provide a regression test for the above LLVM fix
and also provide a test case for further analyzing the verifier pruning issue.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Zhenwei Pi <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226223810.236472-1-yhs@fb.com
A test is added for arraymap and percpu arraymap. The test also
exercises the early return for the helper which does not
traverse all elements.
$ ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 hash_map:OK
#45/2 array_map:OK
#45 for_each:OK
Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226204934.3885756-1-yhs@fb.com
A test case is added for hashmap and percpu hashmap. The test
also exercises nested bpf_for_each_map_elem() calls like
bpf_prog:
bpf_for_each_map_elem(func1)
func1:
bpf_for_each_map_elem(func2)
func2:
$ ./test_progs -n 45
#45/1 hash_map:OK
#45 for_each:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210226204933.3885657-1-yhs@fb.com
Task local storage is enabled for tracing programs. Add two tests for
task local storage without CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
The first test stores a value in sys_enter and read it back in sys_exit.
The second test checks whether the kernel allows allocating task local
storage in exit_creds() (which it should not).
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210225234319.336131-4-songliubraving@fb.com
test_global_func9 - check valid pointer's scenarios
test_global_func10 - check that a smaller type cannot be passed as a
larger one
test_global_func11 - check that CTX pointer cannot be passed
test_global_func12 - check access to a null pointer
test_global_func13 - check access to an arbitrary pointer value
test_global_func14 - check that an opaque pointer cannot be passed
test_global_func15 - check that a variable has an unknown value after
it was passed to a global function by pointer
test_global_func16 - check access to uninitialized stack memory
test_global_func_args - check read and write operations through a pointer
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210212205642.620788-5-me@ubique.spb.ru
