Switch fexit_bpf2bpf selftest to bpf_program__set_attach_target()
instead of using bpf_object_open_opts.attach_prog_fd, which is going to
be deprecated. These changes also demonstrate the new mode of
set_attach_target() in which it allows NULL when the target is BPF
program (attach_prog_fd != 0).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210916015836.1248906-6-andrii@kernel.org
Turn ony libbpf 1.0 mode. Fix all the explicit IS_ERR checks that now will be
broken because libbpf returns NULL on error (and sets errno). Fix
ASSERT_OK_PTR and ASSERT_ERR_PTR to work for both old mode and new modes and
use them throughout selftests. This is trivial to do by using
libbpf_get_error() API that all libbpf users are supposed to use, instead of
IS_ERR checks.
A bunch of checks also did explicit -1 comparison for various fd-returning
APIs. Such checks are replaced with >= 0 or < 0 cases.
There were also few misuses of bpf_object__find_map_by_name() in test_maps.
Those are fixed in this patch as well.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210525035935.1461796-3-andrii@kernel.org
Extend the fexit_bpf2bpf test to check that the info for the bpf_link
returned by the kernel matches the expected values.
While we're updating the test, change existing uses of CHEC() to use the
much easier to read ASSERT_*() macros.
v2:
- Convert last CHECK() call and get rid of 'duration' var
- Split ASSERT_OK_PTR() checks to two separate if statements
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210413091607.58945-2-toke@redhat.com
This adds further tests to ensure access permissions and restrictions
are applied properly for some map types such as sock-map.
It also adds another negative tests to assert static functions cannot be
replaced. In the 'unreliable' mode it still fails with error 'tracing progs
cannot use bpf_spin_lock yet' with the change in the verifier
Signed-off-by: Udip Pant <udippant@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200825232003.2877030-5-udippant@fb.com
This adds test to enforce same check for the return code for the extended prog
as it is enforced for the target program. It asserts failure for a
return code, which is permitted without the patch in this series, while
it is restricted after the application of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Udip Pant <udippant@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200825232003.2877030-4-udippant@fb.com
This adds a selftest that tests the behavior when a freplace target program
attempts to make a write access on a packet. The expectation is that the read or write
access is granted based on the program type of the linked program and
not itself (which is of type, for e.g., BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT).
This test fails without the associated patch on the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Udip Pant <udippant@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200825232003.2877030-3-udippant@fb.com
The 'duration' variable is referenced in the CHECK() macro, and there are
some uses of the macro before 'duration' is set. The clang compiler
(validly) complains about this.
Sample error:
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c:23:6: warning: variable 'duration' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
if (CHECK(err, "prog_load sched cls", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.../selftests/bpf/test_progs.h:134:25: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK'
if (CHECK(err, "prog_load sched cls", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_CHECK(condition, tag, duration, format)
^~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200123235144.93610-1-sdf@google.com
Add program extension tests that build on top of fexit_bpf2bpf tests.
Replace three global functions in previously loaded test_pkt_access.c program
with three new implementations:
int get_skb_len(struct __sk_buff *skb);
int get_constant(long val);
int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var);
New function return the same results as original only if arguments match.
new_get_skb_ifindex() demonstrates that 'skb' argument doesn't have to be first
and only argument of BPF program. All normal skb based accesses are available.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200121005348.2769920-4-ast@kernel.org
