Once drm_framebuffer_init has returned 0, the framebuffer is hooked up
to the reference counting machinery and can no longer be destroyed with
a simple kfree. Therefore, it must be called last.
If drm_framebuffer_init returns 0 but its caller then returns non-0,
there will likely be memory corruption fireworks down the road.
The following lead me to this fix:
[ 12.891228] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:25!
[...]
[ 12.891263] RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x4b/0x70
[...]
[ 12.891324] Call Trace:
[ 12.891330] drm_framebuffer_init+0xb5/0x100 [drm]
[ 12.891378] amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init+0x47/0x120 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891592] ? amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x10d/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891794] amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x126/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891995] drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x378/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892036] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892075] drm_mode_addfb2+0x34/0xd0 [drm]
[ 12.892115] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892153] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe2/0x150 [drm]
[ 12.892193] drm_ioctl+0x3da/0x460 [drm]
[ 12.892232] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892274] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x43/0x80 [amdgpu]
[ 12.892475] __se_sys_ioctl+0x72/0xc0
[ 12.892483] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 12.892491] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Fixes: f258907fdd "drm/amdgpu: Verify bo size can fit framebuffer size on init."
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Once drm_framebuffer_init has returned 0, the framebuffer is hooked up
to the reference counting machinery and can no longer be destroyed with
a simple kfree. Therefore, it must be called last.
If drm_framebuffer_init returns 0 but its caller then returns non-0,
there will likely be memory corruption fireworks down the road.
The following lead me to this fix:
[ 12.891228] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:25!
[...]
[ 12.891263] RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x4b/0x70
[...]
[ 12.891324] Call Trace:
[ 12.891330] drm_framebuffer_init+0xb5/0x100 [drm]
[ 12.891378] amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init+0x47/0x120 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891592] ? amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x10d/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891794] amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x126/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891995] drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x378/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892036] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892075] drm_mode_addfb2+0x34/0xd0 [drm]
[ 12.892115] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892153] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe2/0x150 [drm]
[ 12.892193] drm_ioctl+0x3da/0x460 [drm]
[ 12.892232] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892274] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x43/0x80 [amdgpu]
[ 12.892475] __se_sys_ioctl+0x72/0xc0
[ 12.892483] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 12.892491] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Fixes: f258907fdd "drm/amdgpu: Verify bo size can fit framebuffer size on init."
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fix coccicheck warning:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn31/display_rq_dlg_calc_31.c:
55:12-42: duplicated argument to && or ||
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
the following warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment
with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough:
rivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c:672:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
case AUX_TRANSACTION_REPLY_I2C_OVER_AUX_DEFER:
^
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings, so in order to globally enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, these comments need to be
replaced with fallthrough; in the whole codebase.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GCC reports the following warning with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_psr.c:70:13:
warning:
variable ‘dc’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
70 | struct dc *dc = NULL;
| ^~
This variable is not used in function, this commit remove it to
fix the warning.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GCC reports the following warning with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_link_dp.c:3635:17:
warning:
variable ‘status’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
3635 | enum dc_status status = DC_ERROR_UNEXPECTED;
| ^~~~~~
The variable should be used for error check, let's fix it.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In the past, we use MMSCH to determine whether a VCN is enabled or not.
This is not reliable since after a FLR, MMSCH may report junk data.
It is better to use IP discovery data.
Signed-off-by: Bokun Zhang <Bokun.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Ju Zhou <PengJu.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Recently, we added support for an experimental feature named Freesync
video; for more details on that, refer to:
commit 6f59f229f8 ("drm/amd/display: Skip modeset for front porch change")
commit d10cd527f5 ("drm/amd/display: Add freesync video modes based on preferred modes")
commit 0eb1af2e82 ("drm/amd/display: Add module parameter for freesync video mode")
Nevertheless, we did not document it in detail in our driver. This
commit introduces a kernel-doc and expands the module parameter
description.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Probably a rebase leftover. This doesn't apply to SR-IOV, and
the non-SR-IOV code below it already handles this properly.
Reviewed-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Current watermarks end up programming lowers watermarks which
results in screen flickering and underflow for certain modes like 1440p.
[How]
Add 11us to stutter exit & stutter enter plus exit watermark.
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <jun.lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Because TTM do page counting on userptr BOs which is actually not
needed. To avoid that, lets set TTM_PAGE_FLAG_SG after tt_create and
before tt_populate.
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn31/dcn31_resource.c:917:56-57:
pstate_enabled: first occurrence line 935, second occurrence line 937
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Calling free_mqd inside of destroy_queue_nocpsch_locked can cause a
circular lock. destroy_queue_nocpsch_locked is called under a DQM lock,
which is taken in MMU notifiers, potentially in FS reclaim context.
Taking another lock, which is BO reservation lock from free_mqd, while
causing an FS reclaim inside the DQM lock creates a problematic circular
lock dependency. Therefore move free_mqd out of
destroy_queue_nocpsch_locked and call it after unlocking DQM.
Signed-off-by: Amber Lin <Amber.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Page table entries are now in embedded in VM BO, so
we do not need struct amdgpu_vm_pt. This patch replaces
struct amdgpu_vm_pt with struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
For ASICs that need to load sys_drv_aux and sos_aux,
the sys_start_addr is not the start address of psp
ucode array because the sys_drv_aux and sos_aux actaully
located at the end of the ucode array, instead, the
psp ucode arrary start address should be sos_hdr +
sos_hdr_offset.
Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: John Clements <John.Clements@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When some GPUs don't support SVM, don't disabe it for the entire process.
That would be inconsistent with the information the process got from the
topology, which indicates SVM support per GPU.
Instead disable SVM support only for the unsupported GPUs. This is done
by checking any per-device attributes against the bitmap of supported
GPUs. Also use the supported GPU bitmap to initialize access bitmaps for
new SVM address ranges.
Don't handle recoverable page faults from unsupported GPUs. (I don't
think there will be unsupported GPUs that can generate recoverable page
faults. But better safe than sorry.)
Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Philip Yang <philip.yang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
DP LL Compliance tests require that the first DPCD transactions after a
hotplug have a timeout interval of 3.2 ms. In cases where LTTPR is
disabled, this means that the first reads from DP_SET_POWER and DP_DPCD_REV must have an extended
timeout.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
When changing the DISPCLK_WDIVIDER value from 126 to 127, the change in
clock rate is too great for the FIFOs to handle. This can cause visible
corruption during clock change.
HW has handed down this register sequence to fix the issue.
[HOW]
The sequence, from HW:
a. 127 -> 126
Read DIG_FIFO_CAL_AVERAGE_LEVEL
FIFO level N = DIG_FIFO_CAL_AVERAGE_LEVEL / 4
Set DCCG_FIFO_ERRDET_OVR_EN = 1
Write 1 to OTGx_DROP_PIXEL for (N-4) times
Set DCCG_FIFO_ERRDET_OVR_EN = 0
Write DENTIST_DISPCLK_RDIVIDER = 126
Because of frequency stepping, sequence a can be executed to change the
divider from 127 to any other divider value.
b. 126 -> 127
Read DIG_FIFO_CAL_AVERAGE_LEVEL
FIFO level N = DIG_FIFO_CAL_AVERAGE_LEVEL / 4
Set DCCG_FIFO_ERRDET_OVR_EN = 1
Write 1 to OTGx_ADD_PIXEL for (12-N) times
Set DCCG_FIFO_ERRDET_OVR_EN = 0
Write DENTIST_DISPCLK_RDIVIDER = 127
Because of frequency stepping, divider must first be set from any other
divider value to 126 before executing sequence b.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
SCR for DP 2.0 spec says that multiple LTTPRs must not be accessed in a
single AUX transaction.
There may be other places in future where breaking up AUX accesses is
necessary.
[HOW]
Partition the entire DPCD address space into blocks. When an incoming AUX
request spans multiple blocks, break up the request into multiple requests.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
DP 2.0 SCR specifies that
"A DPTX shall distinguish I2C_DEFER|AUX_ACK from AUX_DEFER. AUX retries
due to
I2C_DEFER are not counted as part of minimum 7 retires (sic) upon
AUX_DEFER’s"
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
DP 2.0 SCR specifies that TX devices must retry at least 7 times when
receiving an AUX DEFER reply from RX. In addition, the specification
states that the TX shall not retry indefinitely, and gives a suggestive
timeout interval of 50ms.
[HOW]
Keep retrying until both 7 or more retries have been made, and the 50ms
interval has passed.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Some DPCD addresses, notably LTTPR Capability registers, are expected to
be read all together in a single DPCD transaction. Rather than force callers to
read registers they don't need, we want to quietly extend the addresses
read, and only return back the values the caller asked for.
This does not affect DPCD writes.
[HOW]
Create an additional layer above AUX to perform 'checked' DPCD
transactions.
Iterate through an array of DPCD address ranges that are marked as being
contiguous. If a requested read falls within one of those ranges, extend
the read to include the entire range.
After DPCD has been queried, copy the requested bytes into the caller's
data buffer, and deallocate all resources used.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
DP specifies that an LTTPR device is only present if PHY_REPEATER_CNT is
0x80, 0x40, 0x20, 0x10, 0x08, 0x04, 0x02, or 0x01.
All other values should be considered no LTTPRs present.
[HOW]
Function dp_convert_to_count already does this check. Use it to determine
if PHY_REPEATER_CNT is a valid LTTPR count.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
SCR for DP2.0 requires that LT be performed with PHY_REPEATER_MODE
programmed to 0x55 (Transparent) whenever PHY_REPEATER_CNT is any value
other than 0x80, 0x40, 0x20, 0x10, 0x08, 0x04, 0x02, or 0x01.
[HOW]
Write Non-Transparent (0xAA) to PHY_REPEATER_MODE when LTTPRs detected and Non-Transparent is
requested.
Write Transparent in all other cases.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
SCR for DP 2.0 Spec states that a DPTX shall put LTTPRs into Transparent
mode after reading LTTPR Capability registers on HPD.
The wording of the SCR is somewhat ambiguous as to whether
Transparent mode must be set explicity, or is implicitly set on LTTPR
capability read. Explicitly setting Transparent mode after LTTPR
capability read should cover all
cases.
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anson Jacob <Anson.Jacob@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
