Mixing I915_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS and I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE fared
badly. The two directives conflict, with the contiguous request setting
the min_order to the full size of the object, and the max-segment-size
setting the max_order to the limit of the DMA mapper. This results in a
situation where max_order < min_order, causing our sanity checks to
fail.
Instead of limiting the buddy block size, in the previous patch we split
the oversized buddy into multiple scatterlist elements.
Fixes: d2cf0125d4 ("drm/i915/lmem: Limit block size to 4G")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201202173444.14903-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Adhere to the i915_sg_max_segment() limit on the lengths of individual
scatterlist elements, and in doing so split up very large chunks of lmem
into manageable pieces for the dma-mapping backend.
Reported-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201202173444.14903-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Block sizes are only limited by the largest power-of-two that will fit
in the region size, but to construct an object we also require feeding
it into an sg list, where the upper limit of the sg entry is at most
UINT_MAX. Therefore to prevent issues with allocating blocks that are
too large, add the flag I915_ALLOC_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE which should limit
block sizes to the i915_sg_segment_size().
v2: (matt)
- query the max segment.
- prefer flag to limit block size to 4G, since it's best not to assume
the user will feed the blocks into an sg list.
- simple selftest so we don't have to guess.
Cc: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130134721.54457-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Small objects that only occupy a single page are naturally contiguous,
so mark them as such and allow them the special abilities that come with
it.
A more thorough treatment would extend i915_gem_object_pin_map() to
support discontiguous lmem objects, following the example of
ioremap_prot() and use get_vm_area() + remap_io_sg().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200101220736.1073007-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_region.c:88:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/gtt.c:1285:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1576467845-60920-1-git-send-email-zhengbin13@huawei.com
Convert shmem to an intel_memory_region.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191018090751.28295-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
Volatile objects are marked as DONTNEED while pinned, therefore once
unpinned the backing store can be discarded. This is limited to kernel
internal objects.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
Some kernel internal objects may need to be allocated as a contiguous
block, also thinking ahead the various kernel io_mapping interfaces seem
to expect it, although this is purely a limitation in the kernel
API...so perhaps something to be improved.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
Support memory regions, as defined by a given (start, end), and allow
creating GEM objects which are backed by said region. The immediate goal
here is to have something to represent our device memory, but later on
we also want to represent every memory domain with a region, so stolen,
shmem, and of course device. At some point we are probably going to want
use a common struct here, such that we are better aligned with say TTM.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191008160116.18379-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
