There is no support for two pipes one transcoder for PSR and if we had
that the current code should not use cpu_transcoder.
Also I can't see a scenario where crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch is
set and PSR is not enabled and if by a bug it happens PSR HW will just
ignore any value in set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
So dropping all the rest and keeping the same behavior that we have
with intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch().
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-2-jose.souza@intel.com
We tend to use output_format!=RGB as a shorthand for YCbCr, but
this fails if we have a disabled crtc where output_format==INVALID.
We're now getting some fail from intel_color_check() when we have:
hw.enable==false
hw.ctm!=NULL
output_format==INVALID
Let's avoid that by throwing INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_INVALID to the
dumpster, and thus everything defaults to RGB when the crtc
is disabled.
This does beg the deeper question of how much of the state
should we in fact be validating when hw/uapi.enable==false.
And should we even be doing the uapi->hw copy when
uapi.enable==false? So far I've not been able to come up with
satisfactory answers for myself, so I'm putting it off for the
moment.
Cc: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Fixes: 0aa5c3835c ("drm/i915: support two CSC module on gen11 and later")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2964
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210205202322.27608-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Instead of every new platform having yet another masive
copy of the whole PLL sanitation code, let's just reuse the
.disable_clock() hook for this purpose. We do need to plug
this into the ICL+ DSI code for that, but fortunately it
already has a suitable function we can use.
We do lose the debug message though on account of not bothering
to check if the clock is actually enabled or not before turning
it off. We could introduce yet another vfunc to query the current
state, but not sure it's worth the hassle?
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210205214634.19341-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
For ICL+ we have several styles of clock routing for DDIs:
1) TC DDI + TC PHY
-> needs DDI_CLK_SEL==MG/TBT part form intel_ddi_clk_{select,disable}()
and ICL_DPCLKA_CFGCR0_TC_CLK_OFF part form icl_{map,unmap}_plls_to_ports()
2) ICL/TGL combo DDI + combo PHY
-> just need the stuff from icl_{map,unmap}_plls_to_ports()
3) JSL/EHL TC DDI + combo PHY
-> needs DDI_CLK_SEL==MG part from intel_ddi_clk_{select,disable}() and
the full combo style clock selection from icl_{map,unmap}_plls_to_ports()
4) ADLS/RKL
-> these use both TC and combo DDIs with combo PHYs, however they
always use the full combo style clock selection as per
icl_{map,unmap}_plls_to_ports() and do not use DDI_CLK_SEL at all,
thus get treated the same as 2)
We extract all that from the current mess in the following way:
1) icl_ddi_tc_{enable,disable}_clock()
2) icl_ddi_combo_{enable,disable}_clock()
3) jsl_ddi_tc_{enable,disable}_clock()
4) for now we reuse icl_ddi_combo_{enable,disable}_clock() here
v2: s/dev_priv/i915/ (Lucas)
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210205214634.19341-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
intel_gt_driver_register() may be called earlier than
intel_opregion_register() and acpi_video_register(), so move it up.
intel_display_debugfs_register() may be called later, together with the
other display-related initializations. There is a slight change in
behavior that sysfs files will show up before the display-related
debugfs files, but that shouldn't be a problem - userspace shouldn't be
relying in debugfs.
This allows us to group all the display-related calls under a single
check for "HAS_DISPLAY()" that can be later moved to a better place.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210213042756.953007-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
In rare circumstances bugs in PCI programming, broken BIOS, or failing
hardware can cause the CPU to lose access to the MMIO BAR on dgfx
platforms. This is a pretty catastrophic failure since all register
reads come back with values of 0xFFFFFFFF. Let's check for this special
case while doing our usual checks for unclaimed registers; the FPGA_DBG
register we use for those checks on modern platforms has some unused
bits that will always read back as 0 when things are behaving properly;
we can use them as canaries to detect when MMIO itself has suddenly
broken and try to print a more informative error message in the logs.
v2: Let the detection function still return 'true' if we've lost our
MMIO access. We'll still get an extra false positive message about
an unclaimed register access, but we'll still honor the 'mmio_debug'
limit and not spam the log. (Lucas)
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210212211925.3418280-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Although the bspec's description doesn't make it very clear, the
hardware architects have confirmed that the FPGA_DBG register that we
use to check for unclaimed MMIO accesses is display-specific and will
only properly flag unclaimed MMIO transactions for registers in the
display range. If a platform doesn't have display, FPGA_DBG itself will
not be available and should not be checked. Let's move the feature flag
into intel_device_info.display to more accurately reflect this.
Given that we now know FPGA_DBG is display-specific, it could be argued
that we should only check it on out intel_de_*() functions. However
let's not make that change right now; keeping the checks in all of the
existing locations still helps us catch cases where regular
intel_uncore_*() functions use bad MMIO offset math / base addresses and
accidentally wind up landing within an unused area within the display
MMIO range. It will also help catch cases where userspace-initiated
MMIO (e.g., IGT's intel_reg tool) attempt to read bad offsets within the
display range.
v2: Add missing hunk with the update to the HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED
macro. (CI)
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210212222049.3516344-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Next, let's start introducing the HPD pin mappings for Intel's new gen9_bc
platform in order to make hotplugging display connectors work. Since
gen9_bc is just a TGP PCH along with a CML CPU, except with the same HPD
mappings as ICL, we simply add a skl_hpd_pin function that is shared
between gen9 and gen9_bc which handles both the traditional gen9 HPD pin
mappings and the Icelake HPD pin mappings that gen9_bc uses.
Changes since v4:
* Split this into its own commit
* Introduce skl_hpd_pin() like vsyrjala suggested and use that instead of
sticking our HPD pin mappings in TGP code
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
[originally from Tejas's work]
Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209212832.1401815-4-lyude@redhat.com
ilk+ planes get notably unhappy when the plane x+w exceeds
the stride. This wasn't a problem previously because we
always aligned SURF to the closest tile boundary so the
x offset never got particularly large. But now with async
flips we have to align to 256KiB instead and thus this
becomes a real issue.
On ilk/snb/ivb it looks like the accesses just wrap
early to the next tile row when scanout goes past the
SURF+n*stride boundary, hsw/bdw suffer more heavily and
start to underrun constantly. i965/g4x appear to be immune.
vlv/chv I've not yet checked.
Let's borrow another trick from the skl+ code and search
backwards for a better SURF offset in the hopes of getting the
x offset below the limit. IIRC when I ran into a similar issue
on skl years ago it was causing the hardware to fall over
pretty hard as well.
And let's be consistent and include i965/g4x in the check
as well, just in case I just got super lucky somehow when
I wasn't able to reproduce the issue. Not that it really
matters since we still use 4k SURF alignment for i965/g4x
anyway.
Fixes: 6ede6b0616 ("drm/i915: Implement async flips for vlv/chv")
Fixes: 4bb18054ad ("drm/i915: Implement async flip for ilk/snb")
Fixes: 2a636e240c ("drm/i915: Implement async flip for ivb/hsw")
Fixes: cda195f13a ("drm/i915: Implement async flips for bdw")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209021918.16234-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
