Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jon Hunter
2ac29a14a8 ARM: PMU: fix runtime PM enable
Commit 7be2958 (ARM: PMU: Add runtime PM Support) updated the ARM PMU code to
use runtime PM which was prototyped and validated on the OMAP devices. In this
commit, there is no call pm_runtime_enable() and for OMAP devices
pm_runtime_enable() is currently being called from the OMAP PMU code when the
PMU device is created. However, there are two problems with this:

1. For any other ARM device wishing to use runtime PM for PMU they will need
   to call pm_runtime_enable() for runtime PM to work.
2. When booting with device-tree and using device-tree to create the PMU
   device, pm_runtime_enable() needs to be called from within the ARM PERF
   driver as we are no longer calling any device specific code to create the
   device. Hence, PMU does not work on OMAP devices that use the runtime PM
   callbacks when using device-tree to create the PMU device.

Therefore,  call pm_runtime_enable() directly from the ARM PMU driver when
registering the device. For platforms that do not use runtime PM,
pm_runtime_enable() does nothing and for platforms that do use runtime PM but
may not require it specifically for PMU, this will just add a little overhead
when initialising and uninitialising the PMU device.

Tested with PERF on OMAP2420, OMAP3430 and OMAP4460.

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
2012-11-09 11:37:26 +00:00
Jon Hunter
76a5d9bfc4 ARM: OMAP4460/4470: PMU: Enable PMU for OMAP4460/70
OMAP4460 and OMAP4470 devices have dedicated PMU interrupts and so add these
interrupts to the MPU HWMOD so we can use these for PMU events on these
devices. The PMU interrupts need to be the first interrupts in the array of
interrupts as the ARM PMU driver assumes this.

By using these dedicated interrupts we only need to enable the MPU and DEBUG
sub-systems for PMU to work. This is different to OMAP4430 that did not have
dedicated interrupts and required other power domains in addition to the DEBUG
sub-system to be enabled so we could route the PMU events to the CTI interrupts.
Hence, OMAP4460 and OMAP4470 devices can use the same list of HWMODs to create
the PMU device that is using by OMAP3.

Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: updated to apply]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
2012-09-23 17:28:30 -06:00
Jon Hunter
6a9bce2766 ARM: OMAP2+: PMU: Add runtime PM support
The original implementation of this patch was done by Ming Lei for PMU on OMAP4
[1]. Since then the PM runtime calls have been moved into the ARM PMU code and
this greatly simplifies the changes.

The another differnce since the original version, is that it is no longer
necessary to call pm_runtime_get/put during the PMU initialisation was we are no
longer accessing the hardware at this stage.

By adding runtime PM support, we can ensure that the appropriate power and clock
domains are kept on while PMU is being used.

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074153.html

Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
2012-09-23 17:28:30 -06:00
Ming Lei
efc7f49c87 ARM: OMAP4430: PMU: prepare to create PMU device via HWMOD
For OMAP4430 PMU events are routed to the CPU via the cross trigger interface
(CTI) because there are no dedicated interrupts. In order to route the PMU
events via the CTI IRQs, the following modules must be enabled:

        l3_instr, l3_main_3, debugss

Therefore, build the arm-pmu device via these three HWMODs.

However, the CTI support for this platform still needs some work.  Until
that's finished, temporarily disable the PMU on OMAP4430.

Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: temporarily disabled OMAP4430 PMU support until a
 better CTI interface can be implemented; added patch description note]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
2012-09-23 17:28:29 -06:00
Jon Hunter
ee75d95cea ARM: OMAP2+: PMU: Convert OMAP2/3 devices to use HWMOD
Convert OMAP2/3 devices to use HWMOD for creating a PMU device. To support PMU
on OMAP2 devices we only need to use MPU sub-system and so we can simply use
the MPU HWMOD to create the PMU device. To support PMU on OMAP3 devices, we need
to use the MPU and DEBUG sub-systems and so use these HWMODs to create the PMU
device for OMAP3.

The MPU HWMOD for OMAP2/3 devices is currently missing the PMU interrupt and so
add the PMU interrupt to the MPU HWMOD for these devices.

This change also moves the PMU code out of the mach-omap2/devices.c files into
its own pmu.c file as suggested by Kevin Hilman to de-clutter devices.c.

Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
[paul@pwsan.com: fixed checkpatch messages; updated to apply; dropped old-style
 initial filename line in header comments]
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
2012-09-23 17:28:29 -06:00