We really should be doing this in the core, not in a driver...
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
The ASoC code always uses -1 as the error code due to reporting errors in
band with the value. Ensure we don't confuse anything by making sure we
don't pass actual error codes back into the rest of the code on read.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The number of connected input and output endpoints for a given widgets
can't change during a DAPM run so there is no need to redo the recursion
through branches of the tree we've already visited. Doing this on one of
my test systems gives an improvement of:
Power Path Neighbour
Before: 63 607 731
After: 63 141 181
which scales up well as more widgets are involved in paths.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This ensures none of the rest of the code ever encounters a widget which
does not have a power check function.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The core will sync DAPM as part of the card initialization, there is no
need for machine drivers to do so during their setup.
OMAP drivers are omitted as I know Peter already has patches for them.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Ensure we only have one sync during the initial startup of the card by
making snd_soc_dapm_sync() a noop on non-instantiated cards. This avoids
any bounces due to things like jacks reporting their initial state on
partially initialised cards. The callers that don't also get called at
runtime should just be removed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Checking the pdata-flags used 'or', so the check is always true. Use 'and' to
correctly mask the flags.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Javier Martin <javier.martin@vista-silicon.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
We synchronise jack state on startup - when we do that make sure that we
have set up all the DAPM widgets first in case we end up touching any of
the partially set up widgets when syncing the jack pins.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
The snd_soc_*_volsw_2r functionality has been merged to
*volsw callbacks.
Few places still used the get, or put variant of volsw_2r,
replace those with the corresponding *_volsw.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Eliminate below build warning:
CC sound/soc/codecs/wm9090.o
sound/soc/codecs/wm9090.c: In function 'wm9090_probe':
sound/soc/codecs/wm9090.c:550: warning: unused variable 'wm9090'
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
These functions are removed in commit f0fba2ad
"ASoC: multi-component - ASoC Multi-Component Support".
Let's remove the leftover function declaration in header file.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Let the user know, that the callback has been called with unexpected
register parameter.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The ASoC core now have one callback function, which can handle
single, and double register mixer controls.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Handle the put_volsw/put_volsw_2r in one function.
To avoid build breakage in twl6040 keep the
snd_soc_put_volsw_2r as define, and map it snd_soc_put_volsw.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Handle the get_volsw/get_volsw_2r in one function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Handle the info_volsw/info_volsw_2r in one function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Avoid using the mc->rreg to identify the 2r type of gain control.
Introduce a variable to track this.
This change is needed to avoid breakage with the upcoming volsw volsw_2r
merger.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The custom get_volsw does not need to call any core get_volsw calls,
since we are returning the shadow values for the gains.
Return -EINVAL in the unlikely event, if the function has been called
for unhandled control. This way we can remove one check in the code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Use the macros for controls require custom get/put function.
This is to make sure that the soc_mixer_control is used
consistently among the drivers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks@mistralsolutions.com>
Cc: Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
We don't really care how many widgets a supply is supplying, we just care
if the number is non-zero. This didn't actually produce any improvement
in the test cases I've been using but seems obviously sensible enough that
I'm pushing it out anyway.
We could do a similar thing for other widgets but this may be unhelpful
for further refactorings Liam was working on aiming to allow us to
identify connected audio paths.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
The whole point of supply widgets is that they aren't inputs to their
sinks so a state change in a supply should never affect the state of the
widget being supplied and we don't need to mark them as dirty.
Power Path Neighbour
Before: 69 727 905
After: 63 607 731
This is particularly useful where supplies affect large portions of the
chip (eg, a bandgap supplying the analogue sections).
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Some widgets will get power_check() run on them more than once during a
DAPM run, most commonly due to supply widgets checking to see if their
consumers are powered up. It's wasteful to do this so cache the result
of power_check() during a run. For one system I tested this on I got an
improvement of:
Power Path Neighbour
Before: 106 970 1186
After: 69 727 905
from this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Help diagnose why we're checking widgets by providing some logging when
we first dirty them. This should possibly be a trace point if it's useful
but can be absurdly verbose if enabled, we can always change it later if
desired.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
If two widgets are not currently connected then there is no need to
propagate a power state change between them as we mark the affected
widgets when we change a connection. Similarly if a neighbour widget is
already in the state being set for the current widget then there is no
need to recheck.
On one system I tested this gave:
Power Path Neighbour
Before: 114 1066 1327
After: 106 970 1186
which is an improvement, although relatively small.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
In order to reduce the number of DAPM power checks we run keep a list of
widgets which have been changed since the last DAPM run and iterate over
that rather than the full widget list. Whenever we change the power state
for a widget we add all the source and sink widgets it has to the dirty
list, ensuring that all widgets in the path are checked.
This covers more widgets than we need to as some of the neighbour widgets
won't be connected but it's simpler as a first step. On one system I tried
this gave:
Power Path Neighbour
Before: 207 1939 2461
After: 114 1066 1327
which seems useful.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
We're not actually doing any dynamic power management based on connection
and output drivers (which are pretty much the same thing) are marked as
unconditionally connected already.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
We've got the same code in two different places, let's have it in a single
place instead.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Future patches will try to reduce the number of widgets we check on each
DAPM run but we're still going to need to look and see if the devices is
on at all so we can manage the overall device bias. Move these checks out
into the main dapm_power_widgets() function so we don't have to think about
them for now.
Once we're doing more incremental updates it'll probably be worth using
refcounts for each bias level to avoid having to do the sweep over all
widgets but that's not going to be where the big performance wins are.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Split the decision about what the new power should be out from the
implementation of that decision.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Return -EINVAL in the unlikely event, if the function has been called
for unhandled control. This way we can remove one check in the code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
It is not required after commit 8d50e447
"ASoC: Factor out I/O for Wolfson 8 bit data 16 bit register CODECs"
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Use snd_soc_update_bits for read-modify-write register access instead of
open-coding it using snd_soc_read and snd_soc_write
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Use snd_soc_update_bits for read-modify-write register access instead of
open-coding it using snd_soc_read and snd_soc_write
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Use snd_soc_update_bits for read-modify-write register access instead of
open-coding it using snd_soc_read and snd_soc_write
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Writing to WM8971_RESET resets all registers to the default state.
Thus we should avoid writing to WM8971_RESET on resume.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
For wm8994-aif2, the rate_reg should be WM8994_AIF2_RATE.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
snd_soc_update_bits() will only write new register value
if the old value is different from the new value.
In additional, snd_soc_update_bits() returns 0 for no change.
No need to read WM8995_CLOCKING_1 register before calling snd_soc_update_bits().
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
snd_soc_update_bits() will only write new register value
if the old value is different from the new value.
In additional, snd_soc_update_bits() returns 0 for no change.
No need to read WM8994_CLOCKING_1 register before calling snd_soc_update_bits().
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
