If we want to be able to hit the instmem fast-path in a few trickier cases,
we need to be more flexible with when we can initialise BAR2 access.
There's probably a decent case to be made for merging BAR/INSTMEM into BUS,
but that's something to ponder another day.
Flushes have been added after the write to bind the instance block,
as later commits will reveal the need for them.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
RM appears to do this really early in its initialisation, before DEVINIT.
We currently do this before BAR2 initialisation for some reason.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
MMU will be needing this to specify kind info on BAR mappings.
We have no userspace currently using these interfaces, so break the ABI
instead of supporting both. NVIF version bump so any future use can be
guarded.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
v2:
- add nv138 and drop nv13b chipsets (Ilia Mirkin)
- refactor out status variable and instead mask tsensor (Ilia Mirkin)
- switch SHADOWed state message away from nvkm_error() (Ilia Mirkin)
- rename internal temperature variable (Karol Herbst)
v3:
- use nvkm_trace() for SHADOWed state message (Ben Skeggs)
Signed-off-by: Rhys Kidd <rhyskidd@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Most of these errors seem to be WFD related. Official documentation
says dcb type 8 is reserved. It's probably used for WFD. Silence
the warning in either case.
Connector type 70 is stated to be a virtual connector for WiFi
display. Since we know this, don't warn that we don't.
Signed-off by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This makes use of all the additional routing and state added in previous
commits, making it possible to deal with GM20x macro link routing, while
also sharing code between the NV50 and GF119 implementations.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These exist to give NVKM information on the set of display paths that
the DD needs to be active at any given time.
Previously, the supervisor attempted to determine this solely from OR
state, but there's a few configurations where this information on its
own isn't enough to determine the specific display paths in question:
- ANX9805, where the PIOR protocol for both DP and TMDS is TMDS.
- On a device using DCB Switched Outputs.
- On GM20x and newer, with a crossbar between the SOR and macro links.
After this commit, the DD tells NVKM *exactly* which display path it's
attempting a modeset on.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Also removes the user-facing methods to these controls, as they're not
currently utilised by the DD anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This hasn't been used since atomic.
We may want to re-implement "fast" DPMS at some point, but for now,
this just gets in the way.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Upcoming commits make supervisor handling share code between the NV50
and GF119 implementations. Because of this, and a few other cleanups,
we need to allow some additional customisation.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In order to properly support the SOR -> SOR + pad macro separation
that occurred with GM20x GPUs, we need to separate OR handling out
of the output path code.
This will be used as the base to support ORs (DAC, SOR, PIOR).
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Primarily intended as a way to pass per-head state around during
supervisor handling, and share logic between NV50/GF119.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This is to allow hw-specific code to instantiate output resources first,
so we can cull unsupported output paths based on them.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
As of DCB 4.1, these are not the same thing.
Compatibility temporarily in place until callers have been updated.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
nvkm_timer_alarm() already handles this as part of protecting against
callers passing in no timeout value.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The nouveau driver, in the Linux 3.7 days, used to try and set the
AVI InfoFrame based on the selected display mode. These days, it
uses a fixed set of InfoFrames. Start to correct that, by
providing a mechanism whereby InfoFrame data may be passed to the
NVKM functions that do the actual configuration.
At this point, only establish the new parameters and their parsing,
don't actually use the data anywhere yet (since it's not supplied
anywhere).
Signed-off-by: Alastair Bridgewater <alastair.bridgewater@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reusing the list_head for both is a bad idea. Callback execution is done
with the lock dropped so that alarms can be rescheduled from the callback,
which means that with some unfortunate timing, lists can get corrupted.
The execution list should not require its own locking, the single function
that uses it can only be called from a single context.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
GP10B's power is managed by generic PM domains, so it does not require a
VDD regulator. Add this option into the chip function structure.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GR is similar to GP100, with a few unavailable registers.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GP10B requires a specific initialization sequence due to the absence of
devinit.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GP10B's MC is compatible with GP100's, but engines need to be explicitly
put out of ELPG during init.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GP10B's FB is largely compatible with the GP100 implementation.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GP10B's FIFO is similar to GP100's, but only allows 512 channels.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
GP10B's secboot is largely similar to GM20B's. Only differences are MC
base address and the fact that GPCCS is also securely managed.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Having access to the secboot instance loading a LS firmware can be
useful to LS firmware handlers. At least more useful than just having an
out-of-context subdev pointer.
GP10B's firmware will also need to know the WPR address, which can be
obtained from the secboot instance.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Change the secboot and msgqueue interfaces to take a mask of falcons to
reset instead of a single falcon. The GP10B firmware interface requires
FECS and GPCCS to be booted in a single firmware command.
For firmwares that only support single falcon boot, it is trivial to
loop over the mask and boot each falcons individually.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This commit reworks the RAM detection algorithm, using RAM-per-LTC to
determine whether a board has a mixed-memory configuration instead of
using RAM-per-FBPA. I'm not certain the algorithm is perfect, but it
should handle all currently known configurations in the very least.
This should fix GTX 970 boards with 4GiB of RAM where the last 512MiB
isn't fully accessible, as well as only detecting half the VRAM on
GF108 boards.
As a nice side-effect, GP10x memory detection now reuses the majority
of the code from earlier chipsets.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Apparently sinks are allows to respond with ACK even if they didn't
fully complete a transaction... It seems like a missed opportunity
for DEFER to me, but what do I know :)
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Differences from GP100:
- 3 PPCs/GPC.
- Another random reg to calculate/write.
- Attrib CB setup a little different.
- PascalB
- PascalComputeB
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These gp10x chips are supporting using (roughly) the same firmware.
Compared to previous secure chips, ACR runs on SEC2 and so does the
low-secure msgqueue.
ACR for these chips is based on r367.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
On some secure boot instances (e.g. gp10x) the load and unload blobs do
not run on the same falcon. Support this case by introducing a new
member to the ACR structure and making related functions take the falcon
to use as an argument instead of assuming the boot falcon is to be used.
The rule is that the load blob can be run on either the SEC or PMU
falcons, but the unload blob must be always run on PMU.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Add support for running the ACR binary on the SEC falcon.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
On SEC, DMEM is unaccessible by the CPU when the falcon is running in LS
mode. This makes communication with the firmware using DMEM impossible.
For this purpose, a new kind of memory (EMEM) has been added. It works
similarly to DMEM, with the difference that its address space starts at
0x1000000. For this reason, it makes sense to treat it like a special
case of DMEM.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
SEC2 is the name given by NVIDIA to the SEC engine post-Fermi (reasons
unknown). Even though it shares the same address range as SEC, its usage
is quite different and this justifies a new engine. Add this engine and
make TOP use it all post-TOP devices should use this implementation and
not the older SEC.
Also quickly add the short gp102 implementation which will be used for
falcon booting purposes.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
gp10x' secure boot requires a blob to be run on NVDEC. Expose the falcon
through a dummy device.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reading registers at device construction time can be harmful, as there
is no guarantee the underlying engine will be up, or in its runtime
configuration. Defer register reading to the oneinit() hook and update
users accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVIDIA-provided PMU firmware is controlled by a msgqueue. Add a member
to the PMU structure as well as the required cleanup code if this
feature is used.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
