Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
a9410a6250
drm/i915/uc: do not free err log on uc_fini
...
We need to keep the GuC error logs around to debug the load failure,
so we can't clean them in the error unwind, which includes uc_fini().
Moving the cleanup to driver remove ensures that the logs stick around
long enough for us to dump them.
v2: reword commit msg (John)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2020-03-26 21:23:22 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
3acffa8cba
drm/i915/uc: Abort early on uc_init failure
...
Now that we can differentiate wants vs uses GuC/HuC, intel_uc_init is
restricted to running only if we have successfully fetched the required
blob(s) and are committed to using the microcontroller(s).
The only remaining thing that can go wrong in uc_init is the allocation
of GuC/HuC related objects; if we get such a failure better to bail out
immediately instead of wedging later, like we do for e.g.
intel_engines_init, since without objects we can't use the HW, including
not being able to attempt the firmware load.
While at it, remove the unneeded fw_cleanup call (this is handled
outside of gt_init) and add a probe failure injection point for testing.
Also, update the logs for <g/h>uc_init failures to probe_failure() since
they will cause the driver load to fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com >
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2020-02-20 17:48:07 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
202c98e716
drm/i915/guc: Apply new uC status tracking to GuC submission as well
...
To be able to differentiate the before and after of our commitment to
GuC submission, which will be used in follow-up patches to early set-up
the submission structures.
v2: move functions to guc_submission.h (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2020-02-20 17:48:06 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
bfe5a40a7b
drm/i915/uc: Improve tracking of uC init status
...
To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need
to commit to using GuC as soon as possible.
Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the
microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fundamental
error (e.g. OOM); given that if we hit such an error we can't really
fall-back to anything, we can "officialize" the FW fetching completion
as the moment at which we're committing to using GuC.
To better differentiate this case, the uses_guc check, which indicates
that GuC is supported and was selected in modparam, is renamed to
wants_guc and a new uses_guc is introduced to represent the case were
we're committed to using the GuC. Note that uses_guc does still not imply
that the blob is actually loaded on the HW (is_running is the check for
that). Also, since we need to have attempted the fetch for the result
of uses_guc to be meaningful, we need to make sure we've moved away
from INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED.
All the GuC changes have been mirrored on the HuC for coherency.
v2: split fetch return changes and new macros to their own patches,
support HuC only if GuC is wanted, improve "used" state
description (Michal)
v3: s/wants_huc/uses_huc in uc_init_wopcm
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com >
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com > #v1
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2020-02-20 17:48:05 +00:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
4c467d5dcd
drm/i915/uc: autogenerate uC checker functions
...
We want to map uC-level checks to GuC/HuC-level ones. The mapping from
the uC state to the GuC/HuC one follows the same pattern for all the
functions:
uc_xxx_guc() -> guc_is_yyy()
So we can easily use a macro to autogenerate the functions via macros by
passing in the 2 mapped states.
v2: Split this change to its own patch (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2020-02-20 17:48:05 +00:00
Michal Wajdeczko
1868c7579f
drm/i915/uc: Add sanitize to to intel_uc_ops
...
uC sanitization is only meaningful if we are running with uC present
or enabled. Make this function part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2020-01-11 08:34:29 +00:00
Michal Wajdeczko
cc93f7b040
drm/i915/uc: Add init/fini to to intel_uc_ops
...
uC preparation and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2020-01-11 08:34:29 +00:00
Michal Wajdeczko
39ddb86320
drm/i915/uc: Add init_fw/fini_fw to to intel_uc_ops
...
Firmware fetching and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2020-01-11 08:34:28 +00:00
Michal Wajdeczko
6fbeda0bfd
drm/i915/uc: Add ops to intel_uc
...
Instead of spreading multiple conditionals across the uC code
to find out current mode of uC operation, start using predefined
set of function pointers that reflect that mode.
Begin with pair of init_hw/fini_hw functions that are responsible
for uC hardware initialization and cleanup.
v2: drop ops_none, use macro to generate ops helpers
v3: reuse __uc_check_hw to avoid redundant comment
v4: forward declare ops struct vs functions
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2020-01-11 08:34:28 +00:00
Michal Wajdeczko
0075a20a6d
drm/i915/uc: Never fail on uC preparation step
...
Let's wait with decision about importance of uC failure to
hardware initialization step.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190817131144.26884-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-17 15:04:37 +01:00
Michal Wajdeczko
356c484822
drm/i915/uc: Add explicit DISABLED state for firmware
...
We really need to have separate NOT_SUPPORTED state (for
lack of hardware support) and DISABLED state (to indicate
user decision) as we will have to take special steps even
if GuC firmware is now disabled but hardware exists and
could have been previously used.
v2: fix logic (Chris/CI)
v3: use proper check to avoid probe failure (CI)
v4: explain status transitions (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190816205658.15020-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-16 23:45:54 +01:00
Michal Wajdeczko
3ea5802910
drm/i915/uc: Update copyright and license
...
Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-12 13:01:34 +01:00
Michal Wajdeczko
32ff76e80c
drm/i915/uc: Move GuC error log to uc and release it on fini
...
When we fail to load GuC and want to abort probe, we hit:
<7> [229.915779] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_uc_init_hw [i915]] GuC initialization failed -6
<7> [229.915813] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:i915_gem_init_hw [i915]] Enabling uc failed (-6)
<4> [229.953354] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [229.953355] WARN_ON(dev_priv->mm.shrink_count)
<4> [229.953406] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 3287 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1684 i915_gem_cleanup_early+0xfc/0x110 [i915]
<4> [229.953464] Call Trace:
<4> [229.953489] i915_driver_late_release+0x19/0x60 [i915]
<4> [229.953514] i915_driver_probe+0xb82/0x18a0 [i915]
<4> [229.953519] ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
<4> [229.953545] i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915]
...
<4> [229.962951] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<4> [229.962956] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
<4> [229.962959] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 2395 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:912 __mutex_lock+0x750/0x9b0
<4> [229.963091] Call Trace:
<4> [229.963129] ? i915_vma_destroy+0x86/0x350 [i915]
<4> [229.963166] ? i915_vma_destroy+0x86/0x350 [i915]
<4> [229.963201] i915_vma_destroy+0x86/0x350 [i915]
<4> [229.963236] __i915_gem_free_objects+0xb8/0x510 [i915]
<4> [229.963270] __i915_gem_free_work+0x5a/0x90 [i915]
<4> [229.963275] process_one_work+0x245/0x610
as since commit 6f76098fe0 ("drm/i915/uc: Move uC early functions
inside the GT ones") we cleanup uc after gem.
Move captured GuC load error log to uc struct and release it
in intel_uc_fini() instead of intel_uc_driver_late_release()
Note that intel_uc_driver_late_release() is now empty, but
we can leave it as a placeholder for future code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-02 21:14:32 +01:00
Michal Wajdeczko
724df646c8
drm/i915/guc: Use dedicated flag to track submission mode
...
Instead of relying on enable_guc modparam to represent actual
GuC submission mode, use dedicated flag and look at modparam
only to check if submission was explicitly disabled by the user.
v2: rebased, simplified condition (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-01 21:13:29 +01:00
Michal Wajdeczko
db81bc6eb9
drm/i915/uc: Consider enable_guc modparam during fw selection
...
We can use value of enable_guc modparam during firmware path selection
and start using firmware status to see if GuC/HuC is being used.
This is first step to make enable_guc modparam read-only.
v2: rebased, don't care about <0 (Chris)
v3: oops
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-01 21:13:27 +01:00
Michal Wajdeczko
57a68c3507
drm/i915/uc: Rename intel_uc_is_using* into intel_uc_supports*
...
Rename intel_uc_is_using* into intel_uc_supports* to make clear
distinction from actual state (compare intel_uc_fw_is_running)
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
2019-08-01 21:13:25 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
6f76098fe0
drm/i915/uc: Move uC early functions inside the GT ones
...
uC is a subcomponent of GT, so initialize/clean it as part of it. The
wopcm_init_early doesn't have to be happen before the uC one, but since
in other parts of the code we consider WOPCM first do the same for
consistency.
v2: s/cleanup_early/late_release to match the caller
v3: s/late_release/driver_late_release/ (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com > #v1
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190801005709.34092-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-08-01 17:58:52 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
602776f96b
drm/i915/uc: Don't enable communication twice on resume
...
When coming out of S3/S4 we sanitize and re-init the HW, which includes
enabling communication during uc_init_hw. We therefore don't want to do
that again in uc_resume and can just tell GuC to reload its state.
v2: split uc_resume and uc_runtime_resume to match the suspend
functions and to better differentiate the expected state in the 2
scenarios (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-07-31 10:01:32 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
ca7b2c1bbe
drm/i915/uc: Move intel functions to intel_uc
...
All the intel_uc_* can now be moved to work on the intel_uc structure
for better encapsulation of uc-related actions.
Note: I've introduced uc_to_gt instead of uc_to_i915 because the aim is
to move everything to be gt-focused in the medium term, so we would've
had to replace it soon anyway.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
2019-07-13 20:04:36 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
8b5689d7e3
drm/i915/uc: move GuC/HuC inside intel_gt under a new intel_uc
...
Being part of the GT HW, it make sense to keep the guc/huc structures
inside the GT structure. To help with the encapsulation work done by the
following patches, both structures are placed inside a new intel_uc
container. Although this results in code with ugly nested dereferences
(i915->gt.uc.guc...), it saves us the extra work required in moving
the structures twice (i915 -> gt -> uc). The following patches will
reduce the number of places where we try to access the guc/huc
structures directly from i915 and reduce the ugliness.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
2019-07-13 20:00:30 +01:00
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
0f261b241d
drm/i915/uc: move GuC and HuC files under gt/uc/
...
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com >
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com >
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk >
2019-07-13 19:58:23 +01:00