Testcase stat+json_output.sh fails in powerpc:
86: perf stat JSON output linter : FAILED!
The testcase "stat+json_output.sh" verifies perf stat JSON output. The
test covers aggregation modes like per-socket, per-core, per-die, -A
(no_aggr mode) along with few other tests. It counts expected fields for
various commands. For example say -A (i.e, AGGR_NONE mode), expects 7
fields in the output having "CPU" as first field. Same way, for
per-socket, it expects the first field in result to point to socket id.
The testcases compares the result with expected count.
The values for socket, die, core and cpu are fetched from topology
directory:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology.
For example, socket value is fetched from "physical_package_id" file of
topology directory. (cpu__get_topology_int() in util/cpumap.c)
If a platform fails to fetch the topology information, values will be
set to -1. For example, incase of pSeries platform of powerpc, value for
"physical_package_id" is restricted and not exposed. So, -1 will be
assigned.
Perf code has a checks for valid cpu id in "aggr_printout"
(stat-display.c), which displays the fields. So, in cases where topology
values not exposed, first field of the output displaying will be empty.
This cause the testcase to fail, as it counts number of fields in the
output.
Incase of -A (AGGR_NONE mode,), testcase expects 7 fields in the output,
becos of -1 value obtained from topology files for some, only 6 fields
are printed. Hence a testcase failure reported due to mismatch in number
of fields in the output.
Patch here adds a sanity check in the testcase for topology. Check will
help to skip the test if -1 value found.
Fixes: 0c343af2a2 ("perf test: JSON format checking")
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Suggested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Claire Jensen <cjense@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006155149.67205-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Testcase stat+csv_output.sh fails in powerpc:
84: perf stat CSV output linter: FAILED!
The testcase "stat+csv_output.sh" verifies perf stat CSV output. The
test covers aggregation modes like per-socket, per-core, per-die, -A
(no_aggr mode) along with few other tests. It counts expected fields for
various commands. For example say -A (i.e, AGGR_NONE mode), expects 7
fields in the output having "CPU" as first field. Same way, for
per-socket, it expects the first field in result to point to socket id.
The testcases compares the result with expected count.
The values for socket, die, core and cpu are fetched from topology
directory:
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology.
For example, socket value is fetched from "physical_package_id" file of
topology directory. (cpu__get_topology_int() in util/cpumap.c)
If a platform fails to fetch the topology information, values will be
set to -1. For example, incase of pSeries platform of powerpc, value for
"physical_package_id" is restricted and not exposed. So, -1 will be
assigned.
Perf code has a checks for valid cpu id in "aggr_printout"
(stat-display.c), which displays the fields. So, in cases where topology
values not exposed, first field of the output displaying will be empty.
This cause the testcase to fail, as it counts number of fields in the
output.
Incase of -A (AGGR_NONE mode,), testcase expects 7 fields in the output,
becos of -1 value obtained from topology files for some, only 6 fields
are printed. Hence a testcase failure reported due to mismatch in number
of fields in the output.
Patch here adds a sanity check in the testcase for topology. Check will
help to skip the test if -1 value found.
Fixes: 7473ee56db ("perf test: Add checking for perf stat CSV output.")
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Suggested-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Claire Jensen <cjense@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006155149.67205-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Add tests:
Test with MTC and TSC disabled
Test with branches disabled
Test with/without CYC
Test recording with sample mode
Test with kernel trace
Test virtual LBR
Test power events
Test with TNT packets disabled
Test with event_trace
These tests mostly check that perf record works with the corresponding
Intel PT config terms, sometimes also checking that certain packets do or
do not appear in the resulting trace as appropriate.
The "Test virtual LBR" is slightly trickier, using a Python script to
check that branch stacks are actually synthesized.
Signed-off-by: Ammy Yi <ammy.yi@intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221014170905.64069-8-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This test commonly fails on Arm Juno because the instruction interval
is large enough to miss generating any samples for Perf in system-wide
mode.
Fix this by lowering the interval until a comfortable number of Perf
instructions are generated. The test is still quick to run because only
a small amount of trace is gathered.
Before:
sudo ./perf test coresight -vvv
...
Recording trace with system wide mode
Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
CoreSight system wide testing: FAIL
...
After:
sudo ./perf test coresight -vvv
...
Recording trace with system wide mode
Looking at perf.data file for dumping branch samples:
Looking at perf.data file for reporting branch samples:
Looking at perf.data file for instruction samples:
CoreSight system wide testing: PASS
...
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221005140508.1537277-1-james.clark@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This adds the initial build infrastructure (makefiles maintainers
information) for adding follow-on tests for CoreSight.
Committer notes:
Remove the installation of tests/shell/coresight/*.sh, as there are no
files there yet and thus, at this point, make install fails.
Use $(QUIET_CLEAN) to avoid having extraneous output in the 'make clean'
output.
Also use @$(MAKE) in tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight/Makefile as $(Q)
is not turning into @ when V=1 isn't used, i.e. in the default case it
is not being quiet.
The >/dev/null in the all for tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight/Makefile
is to avoid this:
make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
DESCEND plugins
GEN /tmp/build/perf/python/perf.so
make[4]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
INSTALL trace_plugins
On !arm64 where nothing is done on the main target for
tools/perf/tests/shell/coresight/*/Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Carsten Haitzler <carsten.haitzler@arm.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220909152803.2317006-3-carsten.haitzler@foss.arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The test is designed with a data structure with 64-byte alignment, it
has two fields "data1" and "data2", and other fields are reserved.
Using the "perf mem" command, we can record and report memory samples
for a self-contained workload with 1 second duration. If no samples are
obtained for the data structure "buf1", it reports failure; and by
checking the offset in structure "buf1", if the memory samples aren't
for the "data1" and "data2" fields, it means wrong data symbol parsing
and returns failure.
Committer testing:
[root@quaco ~]# grep -m1 "model name" /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz
[root@quaco ~]#
[root@quaco ~]# perf test -v "data symbol"
104: Test data symbol :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 192318
Compiling test program...
Recording workload...
[ perf record: Woken up 2 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.389 MB /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.LIuQl (5570 samples) ]
Cleaning up files...
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
Test data symbol: Ok
[root@quaco ~]#
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221006101039.47870-1-leo.yan@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
When tracing the kernel with Intel PT, text_poke events are recorded
per-cpu. In per-thread mode that results in a mixture of per-thread and
per-cpu events and mmaps. Check that happens correctly.
The debug output from perf record -vvv is recorded and then awk used to
process the debug messages that indicate what file descriptors were
opened and whether they were mmapped or set-output.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220912083412.7058-12-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The perf probe related tests like probe_vfs_getname.sh which
is in "tools/perf/tests/shell" directory have dependency on
debuginfo information in the kernel. Currently debuginfo
check is handled by skip_if_no_debuginfo function in the
file "lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh". skip_if_no_debuginfo function
looks for this specific error log from perf probe to skip
the testcase:
<<>>
Failed to find the path for the kernel|Debuginfo-analysis is
not supported
<>>
But in some case, like this one in powerpc, while running this
test, observed error logs is:
<<>>
The /lib/modules/<version>/build/vmlinux file has no debug information.
Rebuild with CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y, or install an appropriate debuginfo
package.
Error: Failed to add events.
<<>>
Update the skip_if_no_debuginfo function to include the above
error, to skip the test in these scenarios too.
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916104904.99798-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Reviewed-By: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Commit b55878c90a ("perf test: Add test for branch stack
sampling") added test for branch stack sampling. There is a sanity check
in the beginning to skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch
stack sampling.
Snippet
<<>>
skip the test if the hardware doesn't support branch stack sampling
perf record -b -o- -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
<<>>
But the testcase also uses branch sample types: save_type, any. if any
platform doesn't support the branch filters used in the test, the testcase
will fail. In powerpc, currently mutliple branch filters are not supported
and hence this test fails in powerpc. Fix the sanity check to look at
the support for branch filters used in this test before proceeding with
the test.
Fixes: b55878c90a ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling")
Reported-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nageswara R Sastry <rnsastry@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921145255.20972-2-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Add field checking tests for perf stat JSON output.
Sanity checks the expected number of fields are present, that the
expected keys are present and they have the correct values.
Committer notes:
Had to fix this:
- $(INSTALL) tests/shell/lib/*.sh '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/lib' \
+ $(INSTALL) tests/shell/lib/*.sh '$(DESTDIR_SQ)$(perfexec_instdir_SQ)/tests/shell/lib'; \
Committer testing:
[root@quaco ~]# perf test json
90: perf stat JSON output linter : Ok
[root@quaco ~]# set -o vi
[root@quaco ~]# perf test -v json
90: perf stat JSON output linter :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 560794
Checking json output: no args [Success]
Checking json output: system wide [Success]
Checking json output: system wide Checking json output: system wide no aggregation [Success]
Checking json output: interval [Success]
Checking json output: event [Success]
Checking json output: per core [Success]
Checking json output: per thread [Success]
Checking json output: per die [Success]
Checking json output: per node [Success]
Checking json output: per socket [Success]
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
perf stat JSON output linter: Ok
[root@quaco ~]#
Signed-off-by: Claire Jensen <cjense@google.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alyssa Ross <hi@alyssa.is>
Cc: Claire Jensen <clairej735@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805200105.2020995-3-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
On linux-next tree 'perf test 95' ("Check branch stack sampling") was
added recently.
s390 does not support branch sampling at all and the test case fails
despite for checking branch support before hand.
The check for support of branching uses the software event named "dummy",
as seen in the line:
perf record -b -o- -e dummy -B true > /dev/null 2>&1 || exit 2
However when the branch recording is actually done, a different event is
used, as seen in the line:
perf record -o $TMPDIR/... --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- ...
The event is omitted and for "perf record" the default event is cycles,
which is not supported by s390 and this fails when executed on s390:
# perf record --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- /tmp/__perf_test.program.iDSmQ/a.out
Error:
cycles: PMU Hardware or event type doesn't support branch stack sampling.
#
Therefore fix this and use the same event cycles for testing support
and actually running the test.
Output before:
# ./perf test -Fv 95
95: Check branch stack sampling :
--- start ---
Testing user branch stack sampling
---- end ----
Check branch stack sampling: FAILED!
#
Output after:
# ./perf test -Fv 95
95: Check branch stack sampling :
--- start ---
---- end ----
Check branch stack sampling: Skip
#
Fixes: b55878c90a ("perf test: Add test for branch stack sampling")
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727141439.712582-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Perf test case 83: perf stat CSV output linter might fail
on s390.
The reason for this is the output of the command
./perf stat -x, -A -a --no-merge true
which depends on a .config file setting. When CONFIG_SCHED_TOPOLOGY
is set, the output of above perf command is
CPU0,1.50,msec,cpu-clock,1502781,100.00,1.052,CPUs utilized
When CONFIG_SCHED_TOPOLOGY is *NOT* set the output of above perf
command is
0.95,msec,cpu-clock,949800,100.00,1.060,CPUs utilized
Fix the test case to accept both output formats.
Output before:
# perf test 83
83: perf stat CSV output linter : FAILED!
#
Output after:
# ./perf test 83
83: perf stat CSV output linter : Ok
#
Fixes: ec906102e5 ("perf test: Fix "perf stat CSV output linter" test on s390")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Acked-by: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220720123419.220953-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The testcase 'Check Arm64 callgraphs are complete in fp mode' wants to
see the following output:
610 leaf
62f parent
648 main
However, without excluding kernel callchains, the output might look like:
ffffc2ff40ef1b5c arch_local_irq_enable
ffffc2ff419d032c __schedule
ffffc2ff419d06c0 schedule
ffffc2ff40e4da30 do_notify_resume
ffffc2ff40e421b0 work_pending
610 leaf
62f parent
648 main
Adding '--user-callchains' leaves only the wanted symbols in the chain.
Fixes: cd6382d827 ("perf test arm64: Test unwinding using fame-pointer (fp) mode")
Suggested-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614105207.26223-1-mpetlan@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
perf test -F 83 ("perf stat CSV output linter") fails on s390.
Reason is the wrong number of fields for certain CPU core/die/socket
related output.
On x84_64 the output of command:
# ./perf stat -x, -A -a --no-merge true
CPU0,1.50,msec,cpu-clock,1502781,100.00,1.052,CPUs utilized
CPU1,1.48,msec,cpu-clock,1476113,100.00,1.034,CPUs utilized
...
results in 8 fields with 7 comma separators.
On s390 the output of command:
# ./perf stat -x, -A -a --no-merge -- true
0.95,msec,cpu-clock,949800,100.00,1.060,CPUs utilized
...
results in 7 fields with 6 comma separators. Therefore this tests
fails on s390. Similar issues exist for per-die and per-socket output
which is not supported on s390.
I have rewritten the python program to count commas in each output line
into a bash function to achieve the same result. I hope this makes it a
bit easier.
Output before:
# ./perf test -F 83
83: perf stat CSV output linter :
Checking CSV output: no args [Success]
Checking CSV output: system wide [Success]
Checking CSV output: system wide Checking CSV output: \
system wide no aggregation 6.92,msec,cpu-clock,\
6918131,100.00,6.972,CPUs utilized
...
RuntimeError: wrong number of fields. expected 7 in \
6.92,msec,cpu-clock,6918131,100.00,6.972,CPUs utilized
FAILED!
#
Output after:
# ./perf test -F 83
83: perf stat CSV output linter :
Checking CSV output: no args [Success]
Checking CSV output: system wide [Success]
Checking CSV output: system wide Checking CSV output:\
system wide no aggregation [Success]
Checking CSV output: interval [Success]
Checking CSV output: event [Success]
Checking CSV output: per core [Success]
Checking CSV output: per thread [Success]
Checking CSV output: per die [Success]
Checking CSV output: per node [Success]
Checking CSV output: per socket [Success]
Ok
#
Committer notes:
Continues to work on x86_64
$ perf test lint
89: perf stat CSV output linter : Ok
$ perf test -v lint
Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating BPF maps, etc
89: perf stat CSV output linter :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 53133
Checking CSV output: no args [Success]
Checking CSV output: system wide [Skip] paranoid and not root
Checking CSV output: system wide [Skip] paranoid and not root
Checking CSV output: interval [Success]
Checking CSV output: event [Success]
Checking CSV output: per core [Skip] paranoid and not root
Checking CSV output: per thread [Skip] paranoid and not root
Checking CSV output: per die [Skip] paranoid and not root
Checking CSV output: per node [Skip] paranoid and not root
Checking CSV output: per socket [Skip] paranoid and not root
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
perf stat CSV output linter: Ok
$
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Claire Jensen <cjense@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux390-list@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220603113034.2009728-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Add shell test to check if perf-record hangs when recording an arm_spe
event with forks.
The test FAILS if the Kernel is not patched with Commit 961c391217 ("perf:
Always wake the parent event").
Unpatched Kernel:
$ perf test -v 90
90: Check Arm SPE doesn't hang when there are forks
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 14232
Recording workload with fork
Log lines = 90 /tmp/__perf_test.stderr.0Nu0U
Log lines after 1 second = 90 /tmp/__perf_test.stderr.0Nu0U
SPE hang test: FAIL
test child finished with -1
---- end ----
Check Arm SPE trace data in workload with forks: FAILED!
Patched Kernel:
$ perf test -v 90
90: Check Arm SPE doesn't hang when there are forks
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 2930
Compiling test program...
Recording workload...
Log lines = 478 /tmp/__perf_test.log.026AI
Log lines after 1 second = 557 /tmp/__perf_test.log.026AI
SPE hang test: PASS
Cleaning up files...
test child finished with 0
---- end ----
Check Arm SPE trace data in workload with forks: Ok
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220228165655.3920-1-german.gomez@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
