On some Panasonic models the volume up/down/mute keypresses get
reported both through the Panasonic ACPI HKEY interface as well as
through the atkbd device.
Filter out the atkbd scan-codes for these to avoid reporting presses
twice.
Note normally we would leave the filtering of these to userspace by mapping
the scan-codes to KEY_UNKNOWN through /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb.
However in this case that would cause regressions since we were filtering
the Panasonic ACPI HKEY events before, so filter these in the kernel.
Fixes: ed83c91718 ("platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Resolve hotkey double trigger bug")
Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@b1-systems.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624112340.10130-7-hdegoede@redhat.com
On some Panasonic models the volume up/down/mute keypresses get
reported both through the Panasonic ACPI HKEY interface as well as
through the atkbd device.
Filter out the atkbd scan-codes for these to avoid reporting presses
twice.
Note normally we would leave the filtering of these to userspace by mapping
the scan-codes to KEY_UNKNOWN through /lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb.
However in this case that would cause regressions since we were filtering
the Panasonic ACPI HKEY events before, so filter these in the kernel.
Fixes: ed83c91718 ("platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Resolve hotkey double trigger bug")
Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@b1-systems.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624112340.10130-7-hdegoede@redhat.com
drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig is wrapped in one big
if X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES .. endif and X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES already
has a "depends on X86" so the "if X86" in drivers/platform/Kconfig
is not necessary and except for MIPS none of the other includes
there has such an if. So let's remove it.
While at it also move the x86/Kconfig include to the end of the file
for alphabetical sorting.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220620145628.5882-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
the given ACPI device's children.
This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct
acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways
in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the
list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The last resume result exposing logic in cros_ec_sleep_event()
incorrectly requires S0ix support, which doesn't work on ARM based
systems where S0ix doesn't exist. That's because cros_ec_sleep_event()
only reports the last resume result when the EC indicates the last sleep
event was an S0ix resume. On ARM systems, the last sleep event is always
S3 resume, but the EC can still detect sleep hang events in case some
other part of the AP is blocking sleep.
Always expose the last resume result if the EC supports it so that this
works on all devices regardless of S0ix support. This fixes sleep hang
detection on ARM based chromebooks like Trogdor.
Cc: Rajat Jain <rajatja@chromium.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Fixes: 7235560ac7 ("platform/chrome: Add support for v1 of host sleep event")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614075726.2729987-1-swboyd@chromium.org
Add support for the detachable keyboard cover on the Surface Pro 8.
The keyboard cover on the Surface Pro 8 is, unlike the keyboard covers
of earlier Surface Pro generations, handled via the Surface System
Aggregator Module (SSAM). The keyboard and touchpad (as well as other
HID input devices) of this cover are standard SSAM HID client devices
(just like keyboard and touchpad on e.g. the Surface Laptop 3 and 4),
however, some care needs to be taken as they can be physically detached
(similarly to the Surface Book 3). Specifically, the respective SSAM
client devices need to be removed when the keyboard cover has been
detached and (re-)initialized when the keyboard cover has been
(re-)attached.
On the Surface Pro 8, detachment of the keyboard cover (and by extension
its devices) is managed via the KIP subsystem. Therefore, said devices
need to be registered under the KIP device hub, which in turn will
remove and re-create/re-initialize those devices as needed.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-13-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add a Surface System Aggregator Module (SSAM) client device hub for
hot-removable devices managed via the KIP subsystem.
The KIP subsystem (full name unknown, abbreviation has been obtained
through reverse engineering) is a subsystem that manages hot-removable
SSAM client devices. Specifically, it manages HID input devices
contained in the detachable keyboard cover of the Surface Pro 8 and
Surface Pro X.
The KIP subsystem handles a single group of devices (e.g. all devices
contained in the keyboard cover) and cannot handle devices individually.
Thus we model it as a client device hub, which (hot-)removes all devices
contained under it once removal of the hub (e.g. keyboard cover) has
been detected and (re-)adds all devices once the physical hub device has
been (re-)attached. To do this, use the previously generified SSAM
subsystem hub framework.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-12-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The Surface System Aggregator Module (SSAM) has multiple subsystems that
can manage detachable devices. At the moment, we only support the "base"
(BAS/0x11) subsystem, which is used on the Surface Book 3 to manage
devices (including keyboard, touchpad, and secondary battery) connected
to the base of the device.
The Surface Pro 8 has a new type-cover with keyboard and touchpad, which
is managed via the KIP/0x0e subsystem. The general procedure is the
same, but with slightly different events and setup. To make
implementation of the KIP hub easier and prevent duplication, generify
the parts of the base hub that we can use for the KIP hub (or any
potential future subsystem hubs).
This also switches over to use the newly introduced "hot-remove"
functionality, which should prevent communication issues when devices
have been detached.
Lastly, also drop the undocumented and unused sysfs "state" attribute of
the base hub. It has at best been useful for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-10-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When SSAM client devices have been (physically) hot-removed,
communication attempts with those devices may fail and time out. This
can even extend to event notifiers, due to which timeouts may occur
during device removal, slowing down that process.
Add a parameter to the notifier unregister function that allows skipping
communication with the EC to prevent this. Furthermore, add wrappers for
registering and unregistering notifiers belonging to SSAM client devices
that automatically check if the device has been marked as hot-removed
and communication should be avoided.
Note that non-SSAM client devices can generally not be hot-removed, so
also add a convenience wrapper for those, defaulting to allow
communication.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-4-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Pull x86 platform driver fixes from Hans de Goede:
"Highlights:
- Fix hp-wmi regression on HP Omen laptops introduced in 5.18
- Several hardware-id additions
- A couple of other tiny fixes"
* tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v5.19-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86:
platform/x86/intel: hid: Add Surface Go to VGBS allow list
platform/x86: hp-wmi: Use zero insize parameter only when supported
platform/x86: hp-wmi: Resolve WMI query failures on some devices
platform/x86: gigabyte-wmi: Add support for B450M DS3H-CF
platform/x86: gigabyte-wmi: Add Z690M AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 support
platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: Add check for platform_driver_register
platform/x86/intel: pmc: Support Intel Raptorlake P
platform/x86/intel: Fix pmt_crashlog array reference
platform/mellanox: Add static in struct declaration.
platform/mellanox: Spelling s/platfom/platform/
