forked from Minki/linux
xfs: force summary counter recalc at next mount
Use the "bad summary count" mount flag from the previous patch to skip writing the unmount record to force log recovery at the next mount, which will recalculate the summary counters for us. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
53235f2215
commit
f467cad95f
@ -53,7 +53,8 @@
|
||||
#define XFS_ERRTAG_LOG_ITEM_PIN 30
|
||||
#define XFS_ERRTAG_BUF_LRU_REF 31
|
||||
#define XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SCRUB_REPAIR 32
|
||||
#define XFS_ERRTAG_MAX 33
|
||||
#define XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC 33
|
||||
#define XFS_ERRTAG_MAX 34
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Random factors for above tags, 1 means always, 2 means 1/2 time, etc.
|
||||
@ -91,5 +92,6 @@
|
||||
#define XFS_RANDOM_LOG_ITEM_PIN 1
|
||||
#define XFS_RANDOM_BUF_LRU_REF 2
|
||||
#define XFS_RANDOM_FORCE_SCRUB_REPAIR 1
|
||||
#define XFS_RANDOM_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC 1
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* __XFS_ERRORTAG_H_ */
|
||||
|
@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static unsigned int xfs_errortag_random_default[] = {
|
||||
XFS_RANDOM_LOG_ITEM_PIN,
|
||||
XFS_RANDOM_BUF_LRU_REF,
|
||||
XFS_RANDOM_FORCE_SCRUB_REPAIR,
|
||||
XFS_RANDOM_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct xfs_errortag_attr {
|
||||
@ -157,6 +158,7 @@ XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_RW(log_bad_crc, XFS_ERRTAG_LOG_BAD_CRC);
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_RW(log_item_pin, XFS_ERRTAG_LOG_ITEM_PIN);
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_RW(buf_lru_ref, XFS_ERRTAG_BUF_LRU_REF);
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_RW(force_repair, XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SCRUB_REPAIR);
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_RW(bad_summary, XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC);
|
||||
|
||||
static struct attribute *xfs_errortag_attrs[] = {
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_LIST(noerror),
|
||||
@ -192,6 +194,7 @@ static struct attribute *xfs_errortag_attrs[] = {
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_LIST(log_item_pin),
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_LIST(buf_lru_ref),
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_LIST(force_repair),
|
||||
XFS_ERRORTAG_ATTR_LIST(bad_summary),
|
||||
NULL,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -848,16 +848,30 @@ xfs_log_write_unmount_record(
|
||||
struct xlog_in_core *iclog;
|
||||
struct xlog_ticket *tic = NULL;
|
||||
xfs_lsn_t lsn;
|
||||
uint flags = XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS;
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
|
||||
error = xfs_log_reserve(mp, 600, 1, &tic, XFS_LOG, 0);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
goto out_err;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we think the summary counters are bad, clear the unmount header
|
||||
* flag in the unmount record so that the summary counters will be
|
||||
* recalculated during log recovery at next mount. Refer to
|
||||
* xlog_check_unmount_rec for more details.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (XFS_TEST_ERROR((mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_BAD_SUMMARY), mp,
|
||||
XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC)) {
|
||||
xfs_alert(mp, "%s: will fix summary counters at next mount",
|
||||
__func__);
|
||||
flags &= ~XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* remove inited flag, and account for space used */
|
||||
tic->t_flags = 0;
|
||||
tic->t_curr_res -= sizeof(magic);
|
||||
error = xlog_write(log, &vec, tic, &lsn, NULL, XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS);
|
||||
error = xlog_write(log, &vec, tic, &lsn, NULL, flags);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* At this point, we're umounting anyway, so there's no point in
|
||||
* transitioning log state to IOERROR. Just continue...
|
||||
|
@ -1423,3 +1423,16 @@ xfs_dev_is_read_only(
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Force the summary counters to be recalculated at next mount. */
|
||||
void
|
||||
xfs_force_summary_recalc(
|
||||
struct xfs_mount *mp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!xfs_sb_version_haslazysbcount(&mp->m_sb))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
|
||||
mp->m_flags |= XFS_MOUNT_BAD_SUMMARY;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -435,5 +435,6 @@ int xfs_zero_extent(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_fsblock_t start_fsb,
|
||||
|
||||
struct xfs_error_cfg * xfs_error_get_cfg(struct xfs_mount *mp,
|
||||
int error_class, int error);
|
||||
void xfs_force_summary_recalc(struct xfs_mount *mp);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* __XFS_MOUNT_H__ */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user