forked from Minki/linux
[PATCH] Zone reclaim: resurrect may_swap
Zone reclaim has a huge impact on NUMA performance (f.e. our maximum throughput with XFS is raised from 4GB to 6GB/sec / page cache contamination of numa nodes destroys locality if one just does a large copy operation which results in performance dropping for good until reboot). This patch: Resurrect may_swap in struct scan_control Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fc30128963
commit
f1fd1067ec
@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ struct scan_control {
|
||||
|
||||
int may_writepage;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Can pages be swapped as part of reclaim? */
|
||||
int may_swap;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This context's SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. If freeing memory for
|
||||
* suspend, we effectively ignore SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX.
|
||||
* In this context, it doesn't matter that we scan the
|
||||
@ -458,6 +461,8 @@ static int shrink_list(struct list_head *page_list, struct scan_control *sc)
|
||||
* Try to allocate it some swap space here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (PageAnon(page) && !PageSwapCache(page)) {
|
||||
if (!sc->may_swap)
|
||||
goto keep_locked;
|
||||
if (!add_to_swap(page, GFP_ATOMIC))
|
||||
goto activate_locked;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1166,6 +1171,7 @@ int try_to_free_pages(struct zone **zones, gfp_t gfp_mask)
|
||||
|
||||
sc.gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
|
||||
sc.may_writepage = 0;
|
||||
sc.may_swap = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
inc_page_state(allocstall);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1268,6 +1274,7 @@ loop_again:
|
||||
total_reclaimed = 0;
|
||||
sc.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL;
|
||||
sc.may_writepage = 0;
|
||||
sc.may_swap = 1;
|
||||
sc.nr_mapped = read_page_state(nr_mapped);
|
||||
|
||||
inc_page_state(pageoutrun);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user