leandrof/linux
1
0
Fork 0
forked from Minki/linux
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sched/dl: Use dl_bw_of() under rcu_read_lock_sched()

Browse Source 
rq->rd is freed using call_rcu_sched(), so rcu_read_lock() to access it
is not enough. We should use either rcu_read_lock_sched() or preempt_disable().

Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Fixes: 66339c31bc "sched: Use dl_bw_of() under RCU read lock"
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1412065417.20287.24.camel@tkhai
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kirill Tkhai 2014-09-30 12:23:37 +04:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 10a12983b3
commit f10e00f4bf
1 changed files with 16 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
kernel/sched/core.c
View File

@ -5264,6 +5264,7 @@ static int sched_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb,
{
unsigned long flags;
long cpu = (long)hcpu;
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
@ -5271,15 +5272,19 @@ static int sched_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb,
/* explicitly allow suspend */
if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) {
struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
bool overflow;
int cpus;
rcu_read_lock_sched();
dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
if (overflow)
return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY);
}
@ -7647,11 +7652,10 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
u64 runtime = global_rt_runtime();
u64 period = global_rt_period();
u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
int cpu, ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
rcu_read_lock();
/*
* Here we want to check the bandwidth not being set to some
* value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
@ -7662,25 +7666,27 @@ static int sched_dl_global_constraints(void)
* solutions is welcome!
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
rcu_read_lock_sched();
dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
if (new_bw < dl_b->total_bw)
ret = -EBUSY;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
if (ret)
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
{
u64 new_bw = -1;
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
int cpu;
unsigned long flags;
@ -7690,18 +7696,19 @@ static void sched_dl_do_global(void)
if (global_rt_runtime() != RUNTIME_INF)
new_bw = to_ratio(global_rt_period(), global_rt_runtime());
rcu_read_lock();
/*
* FIXME: As above...
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct dl_bw *dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
rcu_read_lock_sched();
dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
dl_b->bw = new_bw;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int sched_rt_global_validate(void)