forked from Minki/linux
doc/RCU: fix pseudocode in rcuref.txt
atomic_inc_not_zero(v) return 0 if *v = 0. use spin_lock instead of write_lock for update lock. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
429b022af4
commit
e8aed68614
@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ release_referenced() delete()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
If this list/array is made lock free using RCU as in changing the
|
||||
write_lock() in add() and delete() to spin_lock and changing read_lock
|
||||
in search_and_reference to rcu_read_lock(), the atomic_get in
|
||||
search_and_reference could potentially hold reference to an element which
|
||||
write_lock() in add() and delete() to spin_lock() and changing read_lock()
|
||||
in search_and_reference() to rcu_read_lock(), the atomic_inc() in
|
||||
search_and_reference() could potentially hold reference to an element which
|
||||
has already been deleted from the list/array. Use atomic_inc_not_zero()
|
||||
in this scenario as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -40,20 +40,20 @@ add() search_and_reference()
|
||||
{ {
|
||||
alloc_object rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
... search_for_element
|
||||
atomic_set(&el->rc, 1); if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&el->rc)) {
|
||||
write_lock(&list_lock); rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
atomic_set(&el->rc, 1); if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&el->rc)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&list_lock); rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return FAIL;
|
||||
add_element }
|
||||
... ...
|
||||
write_unlock(&list_lock); rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
spin_unlock(&list_lock); rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
} }
|
||||
3. 4.
|
||||
release_referenced() delete()
|
||||
{ {
|
||||
... write_lock(&list_lock);
|
||||
... spin_lock(&list_lock);
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc)) ...
|
||||
call_rcu(&el->head, el_free); delete_element
|
||||
... write_unlock(&list_lock);
|
||||
... spin_unlock(&list_lock);
|
||||
} ...
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&el->rc))
|
||||
call_rcu(&el->head, el_free);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user