[PATCH] mutex: some cleanups
Turn some macros into inline functions and add proper type checking as well as being more readable. Also a minor comment adjustment. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a58e00e7da
commit
e358c1a2c4
@ -17,13 +17,14 @@
|
|||||||
* it wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than
|
* it wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than
|
||||||
* 1 even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
|
* 1 even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#define __mutex_fastpath_lock(count, fail_fn) \
|
static inline void
|
||||||
do { \
|
__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||||
if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0)) \
|
{
|
||||||
fail_fn(count); \
|
if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
|
||||||
else \
|
fail_fn(count);
|
||||||
smp_mb(); \
|
else
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
smp_mb();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count
|
* __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count
|
||||||
@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ do { \
|
|||||||
* or anything the slow path function returns.
|
* or anything the slow path function returns.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static inline int
|
static inline int
|
||||||
__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, fastcall int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
|
if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0))
|
||||||
return fail_fn(count);
|
return fail_fn(count);
|
||||||
@ -59,12 +60,13 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
|||||||
* __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs
|
* __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs
|
||||||
* to return 0 otherwise.
|
* to return 0 otherwise.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#define __mutex_fastpath_unlock(count, fail_fn) \
|
static inline void
|
||||||
do { \
|
__mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||||
smp_mb(); \
|
{
|
||||||
if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return(count) <= 0)) \
|
smp_mb();
|
||||||
fail_fn(count); \
|
if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return(count) <= 0))
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
fail_fn(count);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 1
|
#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 1
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
|||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* Generic implementation of the mutex fastpath, based on xchg().
|
* Generic implementation of the mutex fastpath, based on xchg().
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* NOTE: An xchg based implementation is less optimal than an atomic
|
* NOTE: An xchg based implementation might be less optimal than an atomic
|
||||||
* decrement/increment based implementation. If your architecture
|
* decrement/increment based implementation. If your architecture
|
||||||
* has a reasonable atomic dec/inc then you should probably use
|
* has a reasonable atomic dec/inc then you should probably use
|
||||||
* asm-generic/mutex-dec.h instead, or you could open-code an
|
* asm-generic/mutex-dec.h instead, or you could open-code an
|
||||||
@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
|
|||||||
* wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than 1
|
* wasn't 1 originally. This function MUST leave the value lower than 1
|
||||||
* even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
|
* even when the "1" assertion wasn't true.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#define __mutex_fastpath_lock(count, fail_fn) \
|
static inline void
|
||||||
do { \
|
__mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||||
if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) \
|
{
|
||||||
fail_fn(count); \
|
if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
|
||||||
else \
|
fail_fn(count);
|
||||||
smp_mb(); \
|
else
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
smp_mb();
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count
|
* __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval - try to take the lock by moving the count
|
||||||
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ do { \
|
|||||||
* or anything the slow path function returns
|
* or anything the slow path function returns
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static inline int
|
static inline int
|
||||||
__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
__mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, fastcall int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
|
if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1))
|
||||||
return fail_fn(count);
|
return fail_fn(count);
|
||||||
@ -64,12 +64,13 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
|||||||
* __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs
|
* __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() macro needs to return 1, it needs
|
||||||
* to return 0 otherwise.
|
* to return 0 otherwise.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#define __mutex_fastpath_unlock(count, fail_fn) \
|
static inline void
|
||||||
do { \
|
__mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, fastcall void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *))
|
||||||
smp_mb(); \
|
{
|
||||||
if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 1) != 0)) \
|
smp_mb();
|
||||||
fail_fn(count); \
|
if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 1) != 0))
|
||||||
} while (0)
|
fail_fn(count);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 0
|
#define __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock() 0
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user