From dec08a837fda146fee498ffc5ecd0d2eeeacd025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Wang Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:42:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove the useless branch in c_start() Since 'cpu == -1' in cpumask_next() is legal, no need to handle '*pos == 0' specially. About the comments: /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */ A test with a cpumask in which cpu 0 is not the first has been done, and it works well. This patch will remove that useless branch to clean the code. Signed-off-by: Michael Wang Cc: kjwinchester@gmail.com Cc: borislav.petkov@amd.com Cc: ak@linux.intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1348033343-23658-1-git-send-email-wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c index 8022c6681485..fbd895562292 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c @@ -140,10 +140,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos) { - if (*pos == 0) /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */ - *pos = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask); - else - *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask); + *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask); if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids) return &cpu_data(*pos); return NULL;