forked from Minki/linux
dmaengine: at_xdmac: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293
("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507190046.GA15298@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e05a0b78f3
commit
d9fd428a30
@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ struct at_xdmac {
|
||||
struct clk *clk;
|
||||
u32 save_gim;
|
||||
struct dma_pool *at_xdmac_desc_pool;
|
||||
struct at_xdmac_chan chan[0];
|
||||
struct at_xdmac_chan chan[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user