forked from Minki/linux
Revert "NFS: nfs_rename() handle -ERESTARTSYS dentry left behind"
This reverts commit920b4530fb
which could call d_move() without holding the directory's i_mutex, and reverts commitd4ea7e3c5c
"NFS: Fix old dentry rehash after move", which was a follow-up fix. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Fixes:920b4530fb
("NFS: nfs_rename() handle -ERESTARTSYS dentry left behind") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.10+ Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd171930e6
commit
d9f2950006
51
fs/nfs/dir.c
51
fs/nfs/dir.c
@ -1946,29 +1946,6 @@ nfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfs_link);
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
nfs_complete_rename(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs_renamedata *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dentry *old_dentry = data->old_dentry;
|
||||
struct dentry *new_dentry = data->new_dentry;
|
||||
struct inode *old_inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
|
||||
struct inode *new_inode = d_inode(new_dentry);
|
||||
|
||||
nfs_mark_for_revalidate(old_inode);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (task->tk_status) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
if (new_inode != NULL)
|
||||
nfs_drop_nlink(new_inode);
|
||||
d_move(old_dentry, new_dentry);
|
||||
nfs_set_verifier(new_dentry,
|
||||
nfs_save_change_attribute(data->new_dir));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case -ENOENT:
|
||||
nfs_dentry_handle_enoent(old_dentry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* RENAME
|
||||
* FIXME: Some nfsds, like the Linux user space nfsd, may generate a
|
||||
@ -1999,7 +1976,7 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct inode *old_inode = d_inode(old_dentry);
|
||||
struct inode *new_inode = d_inode(new_dentry);
|
||||
struct dentry *dentry = NULL;
|
||||
struct dentry *dentry = NULL, *rehash = NULL;
|
||||
struct rpc_task *task;
|
||||
int error = -EBUSY;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2022,8 +1999,10 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
* To prevent any new references to the target during the
|
||||
* rename, we unhash the dentry in advance.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!d_unhashed(new_dentry))
|
||||
if (!d_unhashed(new_dentry)) {
|
||||
d_drop(new_dentry);
|
||||
rehash = new_dentry;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (d_count(new_dentry) > 2) {
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
@ -2040,6 +2019,7 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
new_dentry = dentry;
|
||||
rehash = NULL;
|
||||
new_inode = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2048,8 +2028,7 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
if (new_inode != NULL)
|
||||
NFS_PROTO(new_inode)->return_delegation(new_inode);
|
||||
|
||||
task = nfs_async_rename(old_dir, new_dir, old_dentry, new_dentry,
|
||||
nfs_complete_rename);
|
||||
task = nfs_async_rename(old_dir, new_dir, old_dentry, new_dentry, NULL);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(task)) {
|
||||
error = PTR_ERR(task);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
@ -2059,9 +2038,27 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
|
||||
if (error == 0)
|
||||
error = task->tk_status;
|
||||
rpc_put_task(task);
|
||||
nfs_mark_for_revalidate(old_inode);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (rehash)
|
||||
d_rehash(rehash);
|
||||
trace_nfs_rename_exit(old_dir, old_dentry,
|
||||
new_dir, new_dentry, error);
|
||||
if (!error) {
|
||||
if (new_inode != NULL)
|
||||
nfs_drop_nlink(new_inode);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The d_move() should be here instead of in an async RPC completion
|
||||
* handler because we need the proper locks to move the dentry. If
|
||||
* we're interrupted by a signal, the async RPC completion handler
|
||||
* should mark the directories for revalidation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
d_move(old_dentry, new_dentry);
|
||||
nfs_set_verifier(new_dentry,
|
||||
nfs_save_change_attribute(new_dir));
|
||||
} else if (error == -ENOENT)
|
||||
nfs_dentry_handle_enoent(old_dentry);
|
||||
|
||||
/* new dentry created? */
|
||||
if (dentry)
|
||||
dput(dentry);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user