forked from Minki/linux
smb347-charger: Move IRQ enabling to the end of probe
There is a potential problem if we call smb347_irq_enable() from smb347_irq_init() because smb347_irq_enable() makes the device registers read-only once it returns and smb347_irq_init() expects them to still be read-write. Currently no harm happens because it is the last call we make in smb347_irq_init(). Anyway a better place for enabling IRQs is at the end of probe function and this is also symmetric to call smb347_irq_disable() which is done at the beginning of remove function. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
055d7f0f29
commit
d72bade76d
@ -925,10 +925,6 @@ static int smb347_irq_init(struct smb347_charger *smb)
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
goto fail_readonly;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = smb347_irq_enable(smb);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
goto fail_readonly;
|
||||
|
||||
smb347_set_writable(smb, false);
|
||||
smb->client->irq = irq;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -1241,6 +1237,8 @@ static int smb347_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
dev_warn(dev, "failed to initialize IRQ: %d\n", ret);
|
||||
dev_warn(dev, "disabling IRQ support\n");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
smb347_irq_enable(smb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user