forked from Minki/linux
xfs: use b_maps[] for discontiguous buffers
Commits starting at 77c1a08
introduced a multiple segment support
to xfs_buf. xfs_trans_buf_item_match() could not find a multi-segment
buffer in the transaction because it was looking at the single segment
block number rather than the multi-segment b_maps[0].bm.bn. This
results on a recursive buffer lock that can never be satisfied.
This patch:
1) Changed the remaining b_map accesses to be b_maps[0] accesses.
2) Renames the single segment b_map structure to __b_map to avoid
future confusion.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a49f0d1ea3
commit
d44d9bc68e
@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ xfs_buf_get_maps(
|
||||
bp->b_map_count = map_count;
|
||||
|
||||
if (map_count == 1) {
|
||||
bp->b_maps = &bp->b_map;
|
||||
bp->b_maps = &bp->__b_map;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static void
|
||||
xfs_buf_free_maps(
|
||||
struct xfs_buf *bp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (bp->b_maps != &bp->b_map) {
|
||||
if (bp->b_maps != &bp->__b_map) {
|
||||
kmem_free(bp->b_maps);
|
||||
bp->b_maps = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ xfs_buf_allocate_memory(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
use_alloc_page:
|
||||
start = BBTOB(bp->b_map.bm_bn) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
end = (BBTOB(bp->b_map.bm_bn + bp->b_length) + PAGE_SIZE - 1)
|
||||
start = BBTOB(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
end = (BBTOB(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn + bp->b_length) + PAGE_SIZE - 1)
|
||||
>> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
page_count = end - start;
|
||||
error = _xfs_buf_get_pages(bp, page_count, flags);
|
||||
@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ _xfs_buf_read(
|
||||
xfs_buf_flags_t flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT(!(flags & XBF_WRITE));
|
||||
ASSERT(bp->b_map.bm_bn != XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL);
|
||||
ASSERT(bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn != XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
bp->b_flags &= ~(XBF_WRITE | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
|
||||
bp->b_flags |= flags & (XBF_READ | XBF_ASYNC | XBF_READ_AHEAD);
|
||||
@ -1709,7 +1709,7 @@ xfs_buf_cmp(
|
||||
struct xfs_buf *bp = container_of(b, struct xfs_buf, b_list);
|
||||
xfs_daddr_t diff;
|
||||
|
||||
diff = ap->b_map.bm_bn - bp->b_map.bm_bn;
|
||||
diff = ap->b_maps[0].bm_bn - bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn;
|
||||
if (diff < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
if (diff > 0)
|
||||
|
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_buf {
|
||||
struct page **b_pages; /* array of page pointers */
|
||||
struct page *b_page_array[XB_PAGES]; /* inline pages */
|
||||
struct xfs_buf_map *b_maps; /* compound buffer map */
|
||||
struct xfs_buf_map b_map; /* inline compound buffer map */
|
||||
struct xfs_buf_map __b_map; /* inline compound buffer map */
|
||||
int b_map_count;
|
||||
int b_io_length; /* IO size in BBs */
|
||||
atomic_t b_pin_count; /* pin count */
|
||||
@ -330,8 +330,8 @@ void xfs_buf_stale(struct xfs_buf *bp);
|
||||
* In future, uncached buffers will pass the block number directly to the io
|
||||
* request function and hence these macros will go away at that point.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp) ((bp)->b_map.bm_bn)
|
||||
#define XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, bno) ((bp)->b_map.bm_bn = (xfs_daddr_t)(bno))
|
||||
#define XFS_BUF_ADDR(bp) ((bp)->b_maps[0].bm_bn)
|
||||
#define XFS_BUF_SET_ADDR(bp, bno) ((bp)->b_maps[0].bm_bn = (xfs_daddr_t)(bno))
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void xfs_buf_set_ref(struct xfs_buf *bp, int lru_ref)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user