locking/selftest: Avoid false BUG report

The work-around for the expected failure is providing another failure :/

Only when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y do we increment unexpected_testcase_failures,
so only then do we need to decrement, otherwise we'll end up with a negative
number and that will again trigger a BUG (printout, not crash).

Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: d82fed7529 ("locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2017-10-04 10:50:25 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 8b405d5c5d
commit c7e2f69d3e

View File

@ -2031,11 +2031,13 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
print_testname("mixed read-lock/lock-write ABBA"); print_testname("mixed read-lock/lock-write ABBA");
pr_cont(" |"); pr_cont(" |");
dotest(rlock_ABBA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK); dotest(rlock_ABBA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
/* /*
* Lockdep does indeed fail here, but there's nothing we can do about * Lockdep does indeed fail here, but there's nothing we can do about
* that now. Don't kill lockdep for it. * that now. Don't kill lockdep for it.
*/ */
unexpected_testcase_failures--; unexpected_testcase_failures--;
#endif
pr_cont(" |"); pr_cont(" |");
dotest(rwsem_ABBA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM); dotest(rwsem_ABBA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);