libata: remove irq_on from ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset()

It seems irq_on() in ata_bus_reset() and ata_std_postreset()
are leftover of the EDD reset. Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
Albert Lee 2007-07-07 15:00:37 +08:00 committed by Jeff Garzik
parent e04b3b9d03
commit c6e54a5781
2 changed files with 0 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -3164,9 +3164,6 @@ void ata_bus_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81)) if ((slave_possible) && (err != 0x81))
ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err); ap->device[1].class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err);
/* re-enable interrupts */
ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
/* is double-select really necessary? */ /* is double-select really necessary? */
if (ap->device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE) if (ap->device[1].class != ATA_DEV_NONE)
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1); ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);
@ -3551,10 +3548,6 @@ void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
if (sata_scr_read(ap, SCR_ERROR, &serror) == 0) if (sata_scr_read(ap, SCR_ERROR, &serror) == 0)
sata_scr_write(ap, SCR_ERROR, serror); sata_scr_write(ap, SCR_ERROR, serror);
/* re-enable interrupts */
if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
/* is double-select really necessary? */ /* is double-select really necessary? */
if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE) if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE)
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1); ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);

View File

@ -912,10 +912,6 @@ static void scc_std_postreset (struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes)
{ {
DPRINTK("ENTER\n"); DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
/* re-enable interrupts */
if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
ap->ops->irq_on(ap);
/* is double-select really necessary? */ /* is double-select really necessary? */
if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE) if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE)
ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1); ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 1);