forked from Minki/linux
thunderbolt: eeprom: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293
("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb6d3fb354
commit
c2a9fca17e
@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ struct tb_drom_entry_header {
|
||||
|
||||
struct tb_drom_entry_generic {
|
||||
struct tb_drom_entry_header header;
|
||||
u8 data[0];
|
||||
u8 data[];
|
||||
} __packed;
|
||||
|
||||
struct tb_drom_entry_port {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user