forked from Minki/linux
io_uring: optimise io_req_task_work_add()
Inline io_task_work_add() into io_req_task_work_add(). They both work with a request, so keeping them separate doesn't make things much more clear, but merging allows optimise it. Apart from small wins like not reading req->ctx or not calculating @notify in the hot path, i.e. with tctx->task_state set, it avoids doing wake_up_process() for every single add, but only after actually done task_work_add(). Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1d767f078
commit
c15b79dee5
@ -1911,13 +1911,17 @@ static void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int io_task_work_add(struct task_struct *tsk, struct io_kiocb *req,
|
||||
enum task_work_notify_mode notify)
|
||||
static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *tsk = req->task;
|
||||
struct io_uring_task *tctx = tsk->io_uring;
|
||||
enum task_work_notify_mode notify;
|
||||
struct io_wq_work_node *node, *prev;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING))
|
||||
return -ESRCH;
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!tctx);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1930,14 +1934,23 @@ static int io_task_work_add(struct task_struct *tsk, struct io_kiocb *req,
|
||||
test_and_set_bit(0, &tctx->task_state))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!task_work_add(tsk, &tctx->task_work, notify))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* SQPOLL kernel thread doesn't need notification, just a wakeup. For
|
||||
* all other cases, use TWA_SIGNAL unconditionally to ensure we're
|
||||
* processing task_work. There's no reliable way to tell if TWA_RESUME
|
||||
* will do the job.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
notify = (req->ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) ? TWA_NONE : TWA_SIGNAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!task_work_add(tsk, &tctx->task_work, notify)) {
|
||||
wake_up_process(tsk);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Slow path - we failed, find and delete work. if the work is not
|
||||
* in the list, it got run and we're fine.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&tctx->task_lock, flags);
|
||||
wq_list_for_each(node, prev, &tctx->task_list) {
|
||||
if (&req->io_task_work.node == node) {
|
||||
@ -1951,33 +1964,6 @@ static int io_task_work_add(struct task_struct *tsk, struct io_kiocb *req,
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int io_req_task_work_add(struct io_kiocb *req)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *tsk = req->task;
|
||||
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
|
||||
enum task_work_notify_mode notify;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tsk->flags & PF_EXITING)
|
||||
return -ESRCH;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* SQPOLL kernel thread doesn't need notification, just a wakeup. For
|
||||
* all other cases, use TWA_SIGNAL unconditionally to ensure we're
|
||||
* processing task_work. There's no reliable way to tell if TWA_RESUME
|
||||
* will do the job.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
notify = TWA_NONE;
|
||||
if (!(ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL))
|
||||
notify = TWA_SIGNAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = io_task_work_add(tsk, req, notify);
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
wake_up_process(tsk);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool io_run_task_work_head(struct callback_head **work_head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct callback_head *work, *next;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user