security: pass asoc to sctp_assoc_request and sctp_sk_clone
This patch is to move secid and peer_secid from endpoint to association,
and pass asoc to sctp_assoc_request and sctp_sk_clone instead of ep. As
ep is the local endpoint and asoc represents a connection, and in SCTP
one sk/ep could have multiple asoc/connection, saving secid/peer_secid
for new asoc will overwrite the old asoc's.
Note that since asoc can be passed as NULL, security_sctp_assoc_request()
is moved to the place right after the new_asoc is created in
sctp_sf_do_5_1B_init() and sctp_sf_do_unexpected_init().
v1->v2:
- fix the description of selinux_netlbl_skbuff_setsid(), as Jakub noticed.
- fix the annotation in selinux_sctp_assoc_request(), as Richard Noticed.
Fixes: 72e89f5008 ("security: Add support for SCTP security hooks")
Reported-by: Prashanth Prahlad <pprahlad@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
Tested-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
843c3cbbdf
commit
c081d53f97
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int selinux_netlbl_skbuff_getsid(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
int selinux_netlbl_skbuff_setsid(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
u16 family,
|
||||
u32 sid);
|
||||
int selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request(struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
|
||||
int selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||
int selinux_netlbl_inet_conn_request(struct request_sock *req, u16 family);
|
||||
void selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct sock *sk, u16 family);
|
||||
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static inline int selinux_netlbl_skbuff_setsid(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request(struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
|
||||
static inline int selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user