forked from Minki/linux
PATCH] cifs: fix broken mounts when a SSH tunnel is used (try #4)
One more try.. It seems there is a regression that got introduced while Jeff fixed all the mount/umount races. While attempting to find whether a tcp session is already existing, we were not checking whether the "port" used are the same. When a second mount is attempted with a different "port=" option, it is being ignored. Because of this the cifs mounts that uses a SSH tunnel appears to be broken. Steps to reproduce: 1. create 2 shares # SSH Tunnel a SMB session 2. ssh -f -L 6111:127.0.0.1:445 root@localhost "sleep 86400" 3. ssh -f -L 6222:127.0.0.1:445 root@localhost "sleep 86400" 4. tcpdump -i lo 6111 & 5. mkdir -p /mnt/mnt1 6. mkdir -p /mnt/mnt2 7. mount.cifs //localhost/a /mnt/mnt1 -o username=guest,ip=127.0.0.1,port=6111 #(shows tcpdump activity on port 6111) 8. mount.cifs //localhost/b /mnt/mnt2 -o username=guest,ip=127.0.0.1,port=6222 #(shows tcpdump activity only on port 6111 and not on 6222 Fix by adding a check to compare the port _only_ if the user tries to override the tcp port with "port=" option, before deciding that an existing tcp session is found. Also, clean up a bit by replacing if-else if by a switch statment while at it as suggested by Jeff. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishp@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b3859bc9e
commit
bdb97adcdf
@ -1377,7 +1377,7 @@ cifs_parse_mount_options(char *options, const char *devname,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct TCP_Server_Info *
|
||||
cifs_find_tcp_session(struct sockaddr_storage *addr)
|
||||
cifs_find_tcp_session(struct sockaddr_storage *addr, unsigned short int port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct list_head *tmp;
|
||||
struct TCP_Server_Info *server;
|
||||
@ -1397,16 +1397,37 @@ cifs_find_tcp_session(struct sockaddr_storage *addr)
|
||||
if (server->tcpStatus == CifsNew)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (addr->ss_family == AF_INET &&
|
||||
(addr4->sin_addr.s_addr !=
|
||||
server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
else if (addr->ss_family == AF_INET6 &&
|
||||
(!ipv6_addr_equal(&server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr,
|
||||
&addr6->sin6_addr) ||
|
||||
server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_scope_id !=
|
||||
addr6->sin6_scope_id))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
switch (addr->ss_family) {
|
||||
case AF_INET:
|
||||
if (addr4->sin_addr.s_addr ==
|
||||
server->addr.sockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr) {
|
||||
addr4->sin_port = htons(port);
|
||||
/* user overrode default port? */
|
||||
if (addr4->sin_port) {
|
||||
if (addr4->sin_port !=
|
||||
server->addr.sockAddr.sin_port)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
case AF_INET6:
|
||||
if (ipv6_addr_equal(&addr6->sin6_addr,
|
||||
&server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_addr) &&
|
||||
(addr6->sin6_scope_id ==
|
||||
server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_scope_id)) {
|
||||
addr6->sin6_port = htons(port);
|
||||
/* user overrode default port? */
|
||||
if (addr6->sin6_port) {
|
||||
if (addr6->sin6_port !=
|
||||
server->addr.sockAddr6.sin6_port)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
++server->srv_count;
|
||||
write_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
|
||||
@ -1475,7 +1496,7 @@ cifs_get_tcp_session(struct smb_vol *volume_info)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* see if we already have a matching tcp_ses */
|
||||
tcp_ses = cifs_find_tcp_session(&addr);
|
||||
tcp_ses = cifs_find_tcp_session(&addr, volume_info->port);
|
||||
if (tcp_ses)
|
||||
return tcp_ses;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user