ASoC: davinci-pcm: comments for the conversion to BATCH mode
In the previous commit 'ASoC: davinci-pcm: convert to BATCH mode', the phase offset of 2 was mentioned in the commit message but not well commented in the source. Add descriptive comments of the phase offset with and without ping-pong buffers enabled. Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca> Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
52e2c5d38e
commit
bb5b5fd4d4
@ -605,6 +605,18 @@ static int davinci_pcm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
|
||||
print_buf_info(prtd->asp_link[0], "asp_link[0]");
|
||||
print_buf_info(prtd->asp_link[1], "asp_link[1]");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There is a phase offset of 2 periods between the position
|
||||
* used by dma setup and the position reported in the pointer
|
||||
* function.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The phase offset, when not using ping-pong buffers, is due to
|
||||
* the two consecutive calls to davinci_pcm_enqueue_dma() below.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Whereas here, with ping-pong buffers, the phase is due to
|
||||
* there being an entire buffer transfer complete before the
|
||||
* first dma completion event triggers davinci_pcm_dma_irq().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
davinci_pcm_period_elapsed(substream);
|
||||
davinci_pcm_period_elapsed(substream);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -631,6 +643,13 @@ davinci_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
|
||||
int asp_count;
|
||||
unsigned int period_size = snd_pcm_lib_period_bytes(substream);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There is a phase offset of 2 periods between the position used by dma
|
||||
* setup and the position reported in the pointer function. Either +2 in
|
||||
* the dma setup or -2 here in the pointer function (with wrapping,
|
||||
* both) accounts for this offset -- choose the latter since it makes
|
||||
* the first-time setup clearer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock(&prtd->lock);
|
||||
asp_count = prtd->period - 2;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&prtd->lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user