arm64/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE READ_ONCE
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145) Change the spinlock code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4218091cb4
commit
af2e7aaed1
@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
|
static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(ACCESS_ONCE(*lock));
|
return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(READ_ONCE(*lock));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
|
static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
arch_spinlock_t lockval = ACCESS_ONCE(*lock);
|
arch_spinlock_t lockval = READ_ONCE(*lock);
|
||||||
return (lockval.next - lockval.owner) > 1;
|
return (lockval.next - lockval.owner) > 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
#define arch_spin_is_contended arch_spin_is_contended
|
#define arch_spin_is_contended arch_spin_is_contended
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user