forked from Minki/linux
tun: Add support for RFS on tun flows
This patch adds support so that the rps_flow_tables (RFS) can be programmed using the tun flows which are already set up to track flows for the purposes of queue selection. On the receive path (corresponding to select_queue and tun_net_xmit) the rxhash is saved in the flow_entry. The original code only does flow lookup in select_queue, so this patch adds a flow lookup in tun_net_xmit if num_queues == 1 (select_queue is not called from dev_queue_xmit->netdev_pick_tx in that case). The flow is recorded (processing CPU) in tun_flow_update (TX path), and reset when flow is deleted. Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe47755852
commit
9bc8893937
@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ struct tun_flow_entry {
|
||||
struct tun_struct *tun;
|
||||
|
||||
u32 rxhash;
|
||||
u32 rps_rxhash;
|
||||
int queue_index;
|
||||
unsigned long updated;
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ static struct tun_flow_entry *tun_flow_create(struct tun_struct *tun,
|
||||
rxhash, queue_index);
|
||||
e->updated = jiffies;
|
||||
e->rxhash = rxhash;
|
||||
e->rps_rxhash = 0;
|
||||
e->queue_index = queue_index;
|
||||
e->tun = tun;
|
||||
hlist_add_head_rcu(&e->hash_link, head);
|
||||
@ -232,6 +234,7 @@ static void tun_flow_delete(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_flow_entry *e)
|
||||
{
|
||||
tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "delete flow: hash %u index %u\n",
|
||||
e->rxhash, e->queue_index);
|
||||
sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(e->rps_rxhash);
|
||||
hlist_del_rcu(&e->hash_link);
|
||||
kfree_rcu(e, rcu);
|
||||
--tun->flow_count;
|
||||
@ -325,6 +328,7 @@ static void tun_flow_update(struct tun_struct *tun, u32 rxhash,
|
||||
/* TODO: keep queueing to old queue until it's empty? */
|
||||
e->queue_index = queue_index;
|
||||
e->updated = jiffies;
|
||||
sock_rps_record_flow_hash(e->rps_rxhash);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&tun->lock);
|
||||
if (!tun_flow_find(head, rxhash) &&
|
||||
@ -341,6 +345,18 @@ unlock:
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Save the hash received in the stack receive path and update the
|
||||
* flow_hash table accordingly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void tun_flow_save_rps_rxhash(struct tun_flow_entry *e, u32 hash)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(e->rps_rxhash != hash)) {
|
||||
sock_rps_reset_flow_hash(e->rps_rxhash);
|
||||
e->rps_rxhash = hash;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* We try to identify a flow through its rxhash first. The reason that
|
||||
* we do not check rxq no. is because some cards(e.g 82599), chooses
|
||||
* the rxq based on the txq where the last packet of the flow comes. As
|
||||
@ -361,9 +377,10 @@ static u16 tun_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
txq = skb_get_hash(skb);
|
||||
if (txq) {
|
||||
e = tun_flow_find(&tun->flows[tun_hashfn(txq)], txq);
|
||||
if (e)
|
||||
if (e) {
|
||||
txq = e->queue_index;
|
||||
else
|
||||
tun_flow_save_rps_rxhash(e, txq);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
/* use multiply and shift instead of expensive divide */
|
||||
txq = ((u64)txq * numqueues) >> 32;
|
||||
} else if (likely(skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb))) {
|
||||
@ -728,6 +745,22 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
|
||||
if (txq >= tun->numqueues)
|
||||
goto drop;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tun->numqueues == 1) {
|
||||
/* Select queue was not called for the skbuff, so we extract the
|
||||
* RPS hash and save it into the flow_table here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__u32 rxhash;
|
||||
|
||||
rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb);
|
||||
if (rxhash) {
|
||||
struct tun_flow_entry *e;
|
||||
e = tun_flow_find(&tun->flows[tun_hashfn(rxhash)],
|
||||
rxhash);
|
||||
if (e)
|
||||
tun_flow_save_rps_rxhash(e, rxhash);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_net_xmit %d\n", skb->len);
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!tfile);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user