drm/i915: remove i915_hangcheck_hung
Rework of per ring hangcheck made this obsolete. Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
05407ff889
commit
96a764d983
@ -842,7 +842,6 @@ struct i915_gpu_error {
|
|||||||
#define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD 1500 /* in ms */
|
#define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD 1500 /* in ms */
|
||||||
#define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD)
|
#define DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_JIFFIES msecs_to_jiffies(DRM_I915_HANGCHECK_PERIOD)
|
||||||
struct timer_list hangcheck_timer;
|
struct timer_list hangcheck_timer;
|
||||||
int hangcheck_count;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* For reset and error_state handling. */
|
/* For reset and error_state handling. */
|
||||||
spinlock_t lock;
|
spinlock_t lock;
|
||||||
|
@ -2398,27 +2398,6 @@ static bool i915_hangcheck_ring_hung(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
|
|||||||
return !kick_ring(ring);
|
return !kick_ring(ring);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static bool i915_hangcheck_hung(struct drm_device *dev)
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (dev_priv->gpu_error.hangcheck_count++ > 1) {
|
|
||||||
bool hung = true;
|
|
||||||
struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
|
|
||||||
int i;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
DRM_ERROR("Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung\n");
|
|
||||||
i915_handle_error(dev, true);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
|
|
||||||
hung &= i915_hangcheck_ring_hung(ring);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return hung;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return false;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* This is called when the chip hasn't reported back with completed
|
* This is called when the chip hasn't reported back with completed
|
||||||
* batchbuffers in a long time. We keep track per ring seqno progress and
|
* batchbuffers in a long time. We keep track per ring seqno progress and
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user