[IA64] Don't set psr.ic and psr.i simultaneously
It's not a good idea to use "ssm psr.ic | psr.i" to simultaneously enable interrupts and interrupt state collection, the two bits can take effect asynchronously, so it is possible for an interrupt to be serviced while psr.ic is still zero. Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7dcca30a32
commit
83ce6ef840
@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ GLOBAL_ENTRY(mca_handler_bhhook)
|
|||||||
mov b6=loc1
|
mov b6=loc1
|
||||||
;;
|
;;
|
||||||
mov loc1=rp
|
mov loc1=rp
|
||||||
ssm psr.i | psr.ic
|
ssm psr.ic
|
||||||
|
;;
|
||||||
|
srlz.i
|
||||||
|
;;
|
||||||
|
ssm psr.i
|
||||||
br.call.sptk.many rp=b6 // does not return ...
|
br.call.sptk.many rp=b6 // does not return ...
|
||||||
;;
|
;;
|
||||||
mov ar.pfs=loc0
|
mov ar.pfs=loc0
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user