forked from Minki/linux
x86, atomic: atomic64_read() take a const pointer
atomic64_read() doesn't actually write anything (as far as the C environment is concerned... the CPU does actually write but that's an implementation quirk), so it should take a const pointer. This does NOT mean that it is safe to use atomic64_read() on an object in readonly storage (it will trap!) Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120109165859.1879abda.akpm@linux-foundation.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
da517a08ac
commit
8030c36d13
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Atomically reads the value of @v and returns it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline long long atomic64_read(atomic64_t *v)
|
||||
static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long long r;
|
||||
asm volatile(ATOMIC64_ALTERNATIVE(read)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user