x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay
__const_udelay is marked inline, and LTO will happily inline it everywhere Dropping the inline saves ~44k text in a LTO build. 13999560 1740864 1499136 17239560 1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline 13954764 1736768 1499136 17190668 1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline Inlining it has no advantage in general, so its the right thing to do. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171222001821.2157-2-andi@firstfloor.org
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Thomas Gleixner
parent
81bf665d00
commit
7cf1aaa2ad
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
inline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
|
void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
|
unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
|
||||||
int d0;
|
int d0;
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user