forked from Minki/linux
[ARM] 3748/3: Correct error check in vfp_raise_exceptions
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz The recent fix to hide VFP_NAN_FLAG broke the check in vfp_raise_exceptions; it would attempt to deliver an exception mask of 0xfffffeff instead of reporting a serious error condition using printk. Define a safe constant to use for an invalid exception maskm, and use it at both ends. Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a13813e6e
commit
7c6f25141b
@ -353,3 +353,11 @@ u32 vfp_estimate_sqrt_significand(u32 exponent, u32 significand);
|
||||
* A special flag to tell the normalisation code not to normalise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define VFP_NAN_FLAG 0x100
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* A bit pattern used to indicate the initial (unset) value of the
|
||||
* exception mask, in case nothing handles an instruction. This
|
||||
* doesn't include the NAN flag, which get masked out before
|
||||
* we check for an error.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR ((u32)-1 & ~VFP_NAN_FLAG)
|
||||
|
@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
|
||||
|
||||
pr_debug("VFP: raising exceptions %08x\n", exceptions);
|
||||
|
||||
if (exceptions == (u32)-1) {
|
||||
if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
|
||||
vfp_panic("unhandled bounce");
|
||||
vfp_raise_sigfpe(0, regs);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static u32 vfp_emulate_instruction(u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 exceptions = (u32)-1;
|
||||
u32 exceptions = VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
pr_debug("VFP: emulate: INST=0x%08x SCR=0x%08x\n", inst, fpscr);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user