gpiolib: Fix incorrect use of find_next_zero_bit()

Commit b17566a6b0 ("gpiolib: Implement fast processing path in
get/set array"), already fixed to some extent with commit 5d581d7e8cdc
("gpiolib: Fix missing updates of bitmap index"), introduced a new mode
of processing bitmaps where bits applicable for fast bitmap processing
path are supposed to be skipped while iterating bits which don't apply.
Unfortunately, find_next_zero_bit() function supposed to skip over
those fast bits is always called with a 'start' argument equal to an
index of last zero bit found and returns that index value again an
again, causing an infinite loop.

Fix it by incrementing the index uncoditionally before
find_next_zero_bit() is optionally called.

Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Janusz Krzysztofik 2018-09-29 14:20:22 +02:00 committed by Linus Walleij
parent be8c8facc7
commit 799d5eb4e7

View File

@ -2920,12 +2920,11 @@ int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
int hwgpio = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc);
__set_bit(hwgpio, mask);
i++;
if (array_info)
i = find_next_zero_bit(array_info->get_mask,
array_size, i);
else
i++;
} while ((i < array_size) &&
(desc_array[i]->gdev->chip == chip));
@ -2945,12 +2944,11 @@ int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
value = !value;
__assign_bit(j, value_bitmap, value);
trace_gpio_value(desc_to_gpio(desc), 1, value);
j++;
if (array_info)
j = find_next_zero_bit(array_info->get_mask, i,
j);
else
j++;
}
if (mask != fastpath)
@ -3233,12 +3231,11 @@ int gpiod_set_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep,
__clear_bit(hwgpio, bits);
count++;
}
i++;
if (array_info)
i = find_next_zero_bit(array_info->set_mask,
array_size, i);
else
i++;
} while ((i < array_size) &&
(desc_array[i]->gdev->chip == chip));
/* push collected bits to outputs */