vfs: Move waiting for inode writeback from end_writeback() to evict_inode()
Currently, I_SYNC can never be set when evict_inode() (and thus end_writeback()) is called because flusher thread holds inode reference while inode is under writeback. As a result inode_sync_wait() in those places currently does nothing. However that is going to change and unveils problems with calling inode_sync_wait() from end_writeback(). Several filesystems call end_writeback() after they have deleted the inode (btrfs, gfs2, ...) and other filesystems (ext3, ext4, reiserfs, ...) can deadlock when waiting for I_SYNC because they call end_writeback() from within a transaction. To avoid these issues, we move inode_sync_wait() into evict_inode() before calling ->evict_inode(). That way we preserve the current property that ->evict_inode() and writeback never run in parallel and all filesystems are safe. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									4f8ad655db
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						7994e6f725
					
				| @ -500,7 +500,6 @@ void end_writeback(struct inode *inode) | ||||
| 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_data.private_list)); | ||||
| 	BUG_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)); | ||||
| 	BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_CLEAR); | ||||
| 	inode_sync_wait(inode); | ||||
| 	/* don't need i_lock here, no concurrent mods to i_state */ | ||||
| 	inode->i_state = I_FREEING | I_CLEAR; | ||||
| } | ||||
| @ -531,6 +530,8 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	inode_sb_list_del(inode); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	inode_sync_wait(inode); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (op->evict_inode) { | ||||
| 		op->evict_inode(inode); | ||||
| 	} else { | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user