forked from Minki/linux
[TCP]: Fix logic breakage due to DSACK separation
Commit 6f74651ae6
is found guilty
of breaking DSACK counting, which should be done only for the
SACK block reported by the DSACK instead of every SACK block
that is received along with DSACK information.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9ce204f0a
commit
7769f4064c
@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
|
||||
int prior_fackets;
|
||||
u32 lost_retrans = 0;
|
||||
int flag = 0;
|
||||
int dup_sack = 0;
|
||||
int found_dup_sack = 0;
|
||||
int cached_fack_count;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
int first_sack_index;
|
||||
@ -964,20 +964,20 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for D-SACK. */
|
||||
if (before(ntohl(sp[0].start_seq), TCP_SKB_CB(ack_skb)->ack_seq)) {
|
||||
dup_sack = 1;
|
||||
found_dup_sack = 1;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 4;
|
||||
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKRECV);
|
||||
} else if (num_sacks > 1 &&
|
||||
!after(ntohl(sp[0].end_seq), ntohl(sp[1].end_seq)) &&
|
||||
!before(ntohl(sp[0].start_seq), ntohl(sp[1].start_seq))) {
|
||||
dup_sack = 1;
|
||||
found_dup_sack = 1;
|
||||
tp->rx_opt.sack_ok |= 4;
|
||||
NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPDSACKOFORECV);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* D-SACK for already forgotten data...
|
||||
* Do dumb counting. */
|
||||
if (dup_sack &&
|
||||
if (found_dup_sack &&
|
||||
!after(ntohl(sp[0].end_seq), prior_snd_una) &&
|
||||
after(ntohl(sp[0].end_seq), tp->undo_marker))
|
||||
tp->undo_retrans--;
|
||||
@ -1058,6 +1058,7 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
|
||||
__u32 start_seq = ntohl(sp->start_seq);
|
||||
__u32 end_seq = ntohl(sp->end_seq);
|
||||
int fack_count;
|
||||
int dup_sack = (found_dup_sack && (i == first_sack_index));
|
||||
|
||||
skb = cached_skb;
|
||||
fack_count = cached_fack_count;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user