forked from Minki/linux
sockfs: switch to ->free_inode()
we do have an RCU-delayed part there already (freeing the wq), so it's not like the pipe situation; moreover, it might be worth considering coallocating wq with the rest of struct sock_alloc. ->sk_wq in struct sock would remain a pointer as it is, but the object it normally points to would be coallocated with struct socket... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
17ccf9e31e
commit
6d7855c54e
@ -258,12 +258,12 @@ static struct inode *sock_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
return &ei->vfs_inode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void sock_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
static void sock_free_inode(struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct socket_alloc *ei;
|
||||
|
||||
ei = container_of(inode, struct socket_alloc, vfs_inode);
|
||||
kfree_rcu(ei->socket.wq, rcu);
|
||||
kfree(ei->socket.wq);
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(sock_inode_cachep, ei);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void init_inodecache(void)
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct super_operations sockfs_ops = {
|
||||
.alloc_inode = sock_alloc_inode,
|
||||
.destroy_inode = sock_destroy_inode,
|
||||
.free_inode = sock_free_inode,
|
||||
.statfs = simple_statfs,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user