sctp: fix panic when T2-shutdown timer expire on removed transport
If T2-shutdown timer is expired on a removed transport, kernel panic will occur when we do failure management on that transport. You can reproduce this use the following sequence: Endpoint A Endpoint B (ESTABLISHED) (ESTABLISHED) <----------------- SHUTDOWN (SRC=X) ASCONF -----------------> (Delete IP Address = X) <----------------- ASCONF-ACK (Success Indication) <----------------- SHUTDOWN (T2-shutdown timer expire) This patch fixed the problem. Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2c395846c
commit
6345b19985
@ -567,6 +567,14 @@ void sctp_assoc_rm_peer(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
if (asoc->init_last_sent_to == peer)
|
||||
asoc->init_last_sent_to = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we remove the transport an SHUTDOWN was last sent to, set it
|
||||
* to NULL. Combined with the update of the retran path above, this
|
||||
* will cause the next SHUTDOWN to be sent to the next available
|
||||
* transport, maintaining the cycle.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (asoc->shutdown_last_sent_to == peer)
|
||||
asoc->shutdown_last_sent_to = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
asoc->peer.transport_count--;
|
||||
|
||||
sctp_transport_free(peer);
|
||||
|
@ -5432,9 +5432,13 @@ sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_t2_timer_expire(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
|
||||
if (!reply)
|
||||
goto nomem;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Do some failure management (Section 8.2). */
|
||||
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_STRIKE,
|
||||
SCTP_TRANSPORT(asoc->shutdown_last_sent_to));
|
||||
/* Do some failure management (Section 8.2).
|
||||
* If we remove the transport an SHUTDOWN was last sent to, don't
|
||||
* do failure management.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (asoc->shutdown_last_sent_to)
|
||||
sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_STRIKE,
|
||||
SCTP_TRANSPORT(asoc->shutdown_last_sent_to));
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set the transport for the SHUTDOWN/ACK chunk and the timeout for
|
||||
* the T2-shutdown timer.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user