forked from Minki/linux
ACPI / processor: prevent cpu from becoming online
Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using get/put_online_cpus(). Why does the patch change _cpu_up() logic? The patch cares the race of hot-remove cpu and _cpu_up(). If the patch does not change it, there is the following race. hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up() ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ call acpi_processor_handle_eject() | call cpu_down() | call get_online_cpus() | | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here call arch_unregister_cpu() | call acpi_unmap_lsapic() | call put_online_cpus() | | start and continue _cpu_up() return acpi_processor_remove() | continue hot-remove the cpu | So _cpu_up() can continue to itself. And hot-remove cpu can also continue itself. If the patch changes _cpu_up() logic, the race disappears as below: hot-remove cpu | _cpu_up() ----------------------------------------------------------------------- call acpi_processor_handle_eject() | call cpu_down() | call get_online_cpus() | | call cpu_hotplug_begin() and stop here call arch_unregister_cpu() | call acpi_unmap_lsapic() | cpu's cpu_present is set | to false by set_cpu_present()| call put_online_cpus() | | start _cpu_up() | check cpu_present() and return -EINVAL return acpi_processor_remove() | continue hot-remove the cpu | Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
73d4511a5f
commit
5e5041f352
@ -852,8 +852,22 @@ static int acpi_processor_handle_eject(struct acpi_processor *pr)
|
||||
if (cpu_online(pr->id))
|
||||
cpu_down(pr->id);
|
||||
|
||||
get_online_cpus();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The cpu might become online again at this point. So we check whether
|
||||
* the cpu has been onlined or not. If the cpu became online, it means
|
||||
* that someone wants to use the cpu. So acpi_processor_handle_eject()
|
||||
* returns -EAGAIN.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(cpu_online(pr->id))) {
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
pr_warn("Failed to remove CPU %d, because other task "
|
||||
"brought the CPU back online\n", pr->id);
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id);
|
||||
acpi_unmap_lsapic(pr->id);
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
@ -348,11 +348,13 @@ static int __cpuinit _cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, int tasks_frozen)
|
||||
unsigned long mod = tasks_frozen ? CPU_TASKS_FROZEN : 0;
|
||||
struct task_struct *idle;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
cpu_hotplug_begin();
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu)) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
idle = idle_thread_get(cpu);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(idle)) {
|
||||
ret = PTR_ERR(idle);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user