fs: fix superblock iteration race
list_for_each_entry_safe is not suitable to protect against concurrent
modification of the list. 6754af6 introduced a race in sb walking.
list_for_each_entry can use the trick of pinning the current entry in
the list before we drop and retake the lock because it subsequently
follows cur->next. However list_for_each_entry_safe saves n=cur->next
for following before entering the loop body, so when the lock is
dropped, n may be deleted.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
			
			
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									5904b3b81d
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						57439f878a
					
				@ -590,6 +590,8 @@ static void prune_dcache(int count)
 | 
			
		||||
			up_read(&sb->s_umount);
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
		spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
		/* lock was dropped, must reset next */
 | 
			
		||||
		list_safe_reset_next(sb, n, s_list);
 | 
			
		||||
		count -= pruned;
 | 
			
		||||
		__put_super(sb);
 | 
			
		||||
		/* more work left to do? */
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
@ -374,6 +374,8 @@ void sync_supers(void)
 | 
			
		||||
			up_read(&sb->s_umount);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
			spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
			/* lock was dropped, must reset next */
 | 
			
		||||
			list_safe_reset_next(sb, n, s_list);
 | 
			
		||||
			__put_super(sb);
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
@ -405,6 +407,8 @@ void iterate_supers(void (*f)(struct super_block *, void *), void *arg)
 | 
			
		||||
		up_read(&sb->s_umount);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
		/* lock was dropped, must reset next */
 | 
			
		||||
		list_safe_reset_next(sb, n, s_list);
 | 
			
		||||
		__put_super(sb);
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
@ -585,6 +589,8 @@ static void do_emergency_remount(struct work_struct *work)
 | 
			
		||||
		}
 | 
			
		||||
		up_write(&sb->s_umount);
 | 
			
		||||
		spin_lock(&sb_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
		/* lock was dropped, must reset next */
 | 
			
		||||
		list_safe_reset_next(sb, n, s_list);
 | 
			
		||||
		__put_super(sb);
 | 
			
		||||
	}
 | 
			
		||||
	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
@ -544,6 +544,21 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init(struct list_head *list,
 | 
			
		||||
	     &pos->member != (head); 					\
 | 
			
		||||
	     pos = n, n = list_entry(n->member.prev, typeof(*n), member))
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
/**
 | 
			
		||||
 * list_safe_reset_next - reset a stale list_for_each_entry_safe loop
 | 
			
		||||
 * @pos:	the loop cursor used in the list_for_each_entry_safe loop
 | 
			
		||||
 * @n:		temporary storage used in list_for_each_entry_safe
 | 
			
		||||
 * @member:	the name of the list_struct within the struct.
 | 
			
		||||
 *
 | 
			
		||||
 * list_safe_reset_next is not safe to use in general if the list may be
 | 
			
		||||
 * modified concurrently (eg. the lock is dropped in the loop body). An
 | 
			
		||||
 * exception to this is if the cursor element (pos) is pinned in the list,
 | 
			
		||||
 * and list_safe_reset_next is called after re-taking the lock and before
 | 
			
		||||
 * completing the current iteration of the loop body.
 | 
			
		||||
 */
 | 
			
		||||
#define list_safe_reset_next(pos, n, member)				\
 | 
			
		||||
	n = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
/*
 | 
			
		||||
 * Double linked lists with a single pointer list head.
 | 
			
		||||
 * Mostly useful for hash tables where the two pointer list head is
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user