sched: kill task_group balancing

The idea was to balance groups until we've reached the global goal, however
Vatsa rightly pointed out that we might never reach that goal this way -
hence take out this logic.

[ the initial rationale for this 'feature' was to promote max concurrency
  within a group - it does not however affect fairness ]

Reported-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Srivatsa Vaddagiri 2008-06-27 13:41:20 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 4d8d595dfa
commit 53fecd8ae1

View File

@ -1422,9 +1422,7 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry(tg, &task_groups, list) {
long imbalance;
unsigned long this_weight, busiest_weight;
long rem_load, max_load, moved_load;
long rem_load, moved_load;
/*
* empty group
@ -1435,17 +1433,8 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
rem_load = rem_load_move * aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->rq_weight;
rem_load /= aggregate(tg, this_cpu)->load + 1;
this_weight = tg->cfs_rq[this_cpu]->task_weight;
busiest_weight = tg->cfs_rq[busiest_cpu]->task_weight;
imbalance = (busiest_weight - this_weight) / 2;
if (imbalance < 0)
imbalance = busiest_weight;
max_load = max(rem_load, imbalance);
moved_load = __load_balance_fair(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
max_load, sd, idle, all_pinned, this_best_prio,
rem_load, sd, idle, all_pinned, this_best_prio,
tg->cfs_rq[busiest_cpu]);
if (!moved_load)