perf test bpf: Use epoll_wait() instead of epoll_pwait()
The prototype for epoll_wait() is available in older distros, so use it instead of epoll_pwait() (removing the last NULL arg, the sigmask, makes it the same thing anyway) to avoid breaking the build. Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-pwiwizloxt0jujy8em80qut3@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
12f020338a
commit
4ffde49246
@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
|
|||||||
.max_entries = 1,
|
.max_entries = 1,
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
SEC("func=sys_epoll_pwait")
|
SEC("func=sys_epoll_wait")
|
||||||
int bpf_func__sys_epoll_pwait(void *ctx)
|
int bpf_func__sys_epoll_wait(void *ctx)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int ind =0;
|
int ind =0;
|
||||||
int *flag = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&flip_table, &ind);
|
int *flag = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&flip_table, &ind);
|
||||||
|
@ -13,13 +13,13 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
|
#ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int epoll_pwait_loop(void)
|
static int epoll_wait_loop(void)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Should fail NR_ITERS times */
|
/* Should fail NR_ITERS times */
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++)
|
for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++)
|
||||||
epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
|
epoll_wait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0);
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static struct {
|
|||||||
"[basic_bpf_test]",
|
"[basic_bpf_test]",
|
||||||
"fix 'perf test LLVM' first",
|
"fix 'perf test LLVM' first",
|
||||||
"load bpf object failed",
|
"load bpf object failed",
|
||||||
&epoll_pwait_loop,
|
&epoll_wait_loop,
|
||||||
(NR_ITERS + 1) / 2,
|
(NR_ITERS + 1) / 2,
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
|
#ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user