target: Re-add check to reject control WRITEs with overflow data
During v4.3 when the overflow/underflow check was relaxed by commitc72c525022: commitc72c525022Author: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Date: Wed Jul 22 15:08:18 2015 -0700 target: allow underflow/overflow for PR OUT etc. commands to allow underflow/overflow for Windows compliance + FCP, a consequence was to allow control CDBs to process overflow data for iscsi-target with immediate data as well. As per Roland's original change, continue to allow underflow cases for control CDBs to make Windows compliance + FCP happy, but until overflow for control CDBs is supported tree-wide, explicitly reject all control WRITEs with overflow following pre v4.3.y logic. Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.3+ Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									75dbf2d36f
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						4ff83daa02
					
				| @ -1160,15 +1160,28 @@ target_cmd_size_check(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned int size) | ||||
| 	if (cmd->unknown_data_length) { | ||||
| 		cmd->data_length = size; | ||||
| 	} else if (size != cmd->data_length) { | ||||
| 		pr_warn("TARGET_CORE[%s]: Expected Transfer Length:" | ||||
| 		pr_warn_ratelimited("TARGET_CORE[%s]: Expected Transfer Length:" | ||||
| 			" %u does not match SCSI CDB Length: %u for SAM Opcode:" | ||||
| 			" 0x%02x\n", cmd->se_tfo->get_fabric_name(), | ||||
| 				cmd->data_length, size, cmd->t_task_cdb[0]); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		if (cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE && | ||||
| 		    cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB) { | ||||
| 			pr_err("Rejecting underflow/overflow WRITE data\n"); | ||||
| 			return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; | ||||
| 		if (cmd->data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) { | ||||
| 			if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_SCSI_DATA_CDB) { | ||||
| 				pr_err_ratelimited("Rejecting underflow/overflow" | ||||
| 						   " for WRITE data CDB\n"); | ||||
| 				return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 			/*
 | ||||
| 			 * Some fabric drivers like iscsi-target still expect to | ||||
| 			 * always reject overflow writes.  Reject this case until | ||||
| 			 * full fabric driver level support for overflow writes | ||||
| 			 * is introduced tree-wide. | ||||
| 			 */ | ||||
| 			if (size > cmd->data_length) { | ||||
| 				pr_err_ratelimited("Rejecting overflow for" | ||||
| 						   " WRITE control CDB\n"); | ||||
| 				return TCM_INVALID_CDB_FIELD; | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 		/*
 | ||||
| 		 * Reject READ_* or WRITE_* with overflow/underflow for | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user