forked from Minki/linux
usb: ohci: Proper handling of ed_rm_list to handle race condition between usb_kill_urb() and finish_unlinks()
There is a race condition between finish_unlinks->finish_urb() function
and usb_kill_urb() in ohci controller case. The finish_urb calls
spin_unlock(&ohci->lock) before usb_hcd_giveback_urb() function call,
then if during this time, usb_kill_urb is called for another endpoint,
then new ed will be added to ed_rm_list at beginning for unlink, and
ed_rm_list will point to newly added.
When finish_urb() is completed in finish_unlinks() and ed->td_list
becomes empty as in below code (in finish_unlinks() function):
if (list_empty(&ed->td_list)) {
*last = ed->ed_next;
ed->ed_next = NULL;
} else if (ohci->rh_state == OHCI_RH_RUNNING) {
*last = ed->ed_next;
ed->ed_next = NULL;
ed_schedule(ohci, ed);
}
The *last = ed->ed_next will make ed_rm_list to point to ed->ed_next
and previously added ed by usb_kill_urb will be left unreferenced by
ed_rm_list. This causes usb_kill_urb() hang forever waiting for
finish_unlink to remove added ed from ed_rm_list.
The main reason for hang in this race condtion is addition and removal
of ed from ed_rm_list in the beginning during usb_kill_urb and later
last* is modified in finish_unlinks().
As suggested by Alan Stern, the solution for proper handling of
ohci->ed_rm_list is to remove ed from the ed_rm_list before finishing
any URBs. Then at the end, we can add ed back to the list if necessary.
This properly handle the updated ohci->ed_rm_list in usb_kill_urb().
Fixes: 977dcfdc60
("USB: OHCI: don't lose track of EDs when a controller dies")
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Aman Deep <aman.deep@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
91b119359c
commit
46408ea558
@ -1019,6 +1019,8 @@ skip_ed:
|
||||
* have modified this list. normally it's just prepending
|
||||
* entries (which we'd ignore), but paranoia won't hurt.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
*last = ed->ed_next;
|
||||
ed->ed_next = NULL;
|
||||
modified = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* unlink urbs as requested, but rescan the list after
|
||||
@ -1077,21 +1079,22 @@ rescan_this:
|
||||
goto rescan_this;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If no TDs are queued, take ED off the ed_rm_list.
|
||||
* If no TDs are queued, ED is now idle.
|
||||
* Otherwise, if the HC is running, reschedule.
|
||||
* If not, leave it on the list for further dequeues.
|
||||
* If the HC isn't running, add ED back to the
|
||||
* start of the list for later processing.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (list_empty(&ed->td_list)) {
|
||||
*last = ed->ed_next;
|
||||
ed->ed_next = NULL;
|
||||
ed->state = ED_IDLE;
|
||||
list_del(&ed->in_use_list);
|
||||
} else if (ohci->rh_state == OHCI_RH_RUNNING) {
|
||||
*last = ed->ed_next;
|
||||
ed->ed_next = NULL;
|
||||
ed_schedule(ohci, ed);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
last = &ed->ed_next;
|
||||
ed->ed_next = ohci->ed_rm_list;
|
||||
ohci->ed_rm_list = ed;
|
||||
/* Don't loop on the same ED */
|
||||
if (last == &ohci->ed_rm_list)
|
||||
last = &ed->ed_next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (modified)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user