iwlwifi: mvm: better handle several several vifs in BT Coex

When there one vif on 5GHz associating, it would clear all
the BT Coex constraints. This can't work if there is
another vif on 2.4GHz. Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Emmanuel Grumbach 2013-06-25 21:49:19 +03:00 committed by Johannes Berg
parent e811ada7a6
commit 41069b4631
2 changed files with 5 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -384,6 +384,10 @@ static void iwl_mvm_bt_notif_iterator(void *_data, u8 *mac,
smps_mode = IEEE80211_SMPS_AUTOMATIC;
/* non associated BSSes aren't to be considered */
if (!vif->bss_conf.assoc)
return;
if (band != IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ) {
iwl_mvm_update_smps(mvm, vif, IWL_MVM_SMPS_REQ_BT_COEX,
smps_mode);
@ -588,23 +592,5 @@ void iwl_mvm_bt_rssi_event(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
void iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_assoc(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
{
struct ieee80211_chanctx_conf *chanctx_conf;
enum ieee80211_band band;
rcu_read_lock();
chanctx_conf = rcu_dereference(vif->chanctx_conf);
if (chanctx_conf && chanctx_conf->def.chan)
band = chanctx_conf->def.chan->band;
else
band = -1;
rcu_read_unlock();
/* if we are in 2GHz we will get a notification from the fw */
if (band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ)
return;
/* else, we can remove all the constraints */
memset(&mvm->last_bt_notif, 0, sizeof(mvm->last_bt_notif));
iwl_mvm_bt_coex_notif_handle(mvm);
}

View File

@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ static void iwl_mvm_bss_info_changed_station(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
IWL_ERR(mvm, "failed to update quotas\n");
return;
}
iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_assoc(mvm, vif);
iwl_mvm_configure_mcast_filter(mvm, vif);
} else if (mvmvif->ap_sta_id != IWL_MVM_STATION_COUNT) {
/* remove AP station now that the MAC is unassoc */
@ -782,6 +781,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_bss_info_changed_station(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
if (ret)
IWL_ERR(mvm, "failed to update power mode\n");
}
iwl_mvm_bt_coex_vif_assoc(mvm, vif);
} else if (changes & BSS_CHANGED_BEACON_INFO) {
/*
* We received a beacon _after_ association so