* Fix lockdep's detection of "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions, from Peter

Zijlstra.
 
 * Make percpu-rwsem operations on the semaphore's ->read_count IRQ-safe
   because it can be used in an IRQ context, from Hou Tao.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEzv7L6UO9uDPlPSfHEsHwGGHeVUoFAl9nsLQACgkQEsHwGGHe
 VUo0+g/7B9JzDtRSgchT095VcD8w+YcZTyiJM58q9I9OZMxi1zdJZPyoQZ2xZjnG
 aczDJN5H6P6OcBm949EUCHhmDEDfoZpC7Y5FEHe9dJitPmC7rRilGJuz4Im8td3N
 DsLhpFe8KUSqRVyygjvjM393md8tw+m4Jq+syjWri4/1wj1Fs4jHdhKWgz6b2cup
 JXbfjgVOkHVOTloMHnmgdHOPvkh60/LoG8r/5gzLbD8Z/FTD3BSOCTgw+8L8EB+b
 yiWWuEcR5LDjy7sNY2xVhTB+nkHJXe4o+HVufZoAzd1j7FDLfDVSNaZHJVp2m7Gp
 W47xRrzIKIJl6DUp5E4TGi9aZvkO/h5kqSOZ4MhfaeEqw9DLW/KxbherJjzVY3bb
 Nt74N+N+WOq6riTVx5wJkDRmtT5RaeW1kKJUaSeGMl3fxCken5CKE1WyBbae0GiU
 kq3tCn4t0OKCWhuiixFNg6RxuXokjfzXDiHr9aUt3x5musc9P+5YUIdOMsaHwoAH
 0YrAZoRCPyE2ABUgKC8hoTc3Y+TIwji7c0B9S2GoHRTm1LZTRURlLOUQyJ4oU9Ez
 Vt5TILwre9lX9tTW7BlxlOCYkgRQn78vLBSOy1CEUTsORbdYnv/kCy5S5yHEILpT
 f3E345wzdd8zrXGQfX2jsVgNAx0F+81Fb9H9FMJSCFgjIya+SRM=
 =70QQ
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking_urgent_for_v5.9_rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking fixes from Borislav Petkov:
 "Two fixes from the locking/urgent pile:

   - Fix lockdep's detection of "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions (Peter
     Zijlstra)

   - Make percpu-rwsem operations on the semaphore's ->read_count
     IRQ-safe because it can be used in an IRQ context (Hou Tao)"

* tag 'locking_urgent_for_v5.9_rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  locking/percpu-rwsem: Use this_cpu_{inc,dec}() for read_count
  locking/lockdep: Fix "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2020-09-20 15:25:33 -07:00
commit 3d491679b8
4 changed files with 37 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
* anything we did within this RCU-sched read-size critical section.
*/
if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))
__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
else
__percpu_down_read(sem, false); /* Unconditional memory barrier */
/*
@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
* Same as in percpu_down_read().
*/
if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))
__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
else
ret = __percpu_down_read(sem, true); /* Unconditional memory barrier */
preempt_enable();
@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
* Same as in percpu_down_read().
*/
if (likely(rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss))) {
__this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
} else {
/*
* slowpath; reader will only ever wake a single blocked
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
* aggregate zero, as that is the only time it matters) they
* will also see our critical section.
*/
__this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer);
}
preempt_enable();

View File

@ -3969,13 +3969,18 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
{
unsigned int new_mask = 1 << new_bit, ret = 1;
unsigned int old_mask, new_mask, ret = 1;
if (new_bit >= LOCK_USAGE_STATES) {
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1);
return 0;
}
if (new_bit == LOCK_USED && this->read)
new_bit = LOCK_USED_READ;
new_mask = 1 << new_bit;
/*
* If already set then do not dirty the cacheline,
* nor do any checks:
@ -3988,13 +3993,22 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
/*
* Make sure we didn't race:
*/
if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & new_mask)) {
graph_unlock();
return 1;
}
if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & new_mask))
goto unlock;
old_mask = hlock_class(this)->usage_mask;
hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask;
/*
* Save one usage_traces[] entry and map both LOCK_USED and
* LOCK_USED_READ onto the same entry.
*/
if (new_bit == LOCK_USED || new_bit == LOCK_USED_READ) {
if (old_mask & (LOCKF_USED | LOCKF_USED_READ))
goto unlock;
new_bit = LOCK_USED;
}
if (!(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces[new_bit] = save_trace()))
return 0;
@ -4008,6 +4022,7 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
return 0;
}
unlock:
graph_unlock();
/*
@ -4942,12 +4957,20 @@ static void verify_lock_unused(struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
struct lock_class *class = look_up_lock_class(lock, subclass);
unsigned long mask = LOCKF_USED;
/* if it doesn't have a class (yet), it certainly hasn't been used yet */
if (!class)
return;
if (!(class->usage_mask & LOCK_USED))
/*
* READ locks only conflict with USED, such that if we only ever use
* READ locks, there is no deadlock possible -- RCU.
*/
if (!hlock->read)
mask |= LOCKF_USED_READ;
if (!(class->usage_mask & mask))
return;
hlock->class_idx = class - lock_classes;

View File

@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ enum lock_usage_bit {
#include "lockdep_states.h"
#undef LOCKDEP_STATE
LOCK_USED,
LOCK_USED_READ,
LOCK_USAGE_STATES
};
@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ enum {
#include "lockdep_states.h"
#undef LOCKDEP_STATE
__LOCKF(USED)
__LOCKF(USED_READ)
};
#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) LOCKF_ENABLED_##__STATE |

View File

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_free_rwsem);
static bool __percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
{
__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
/*
* Due to having preemption disabled the decrement happens on
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static bool __percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
if (likely(!atomic_read_acquire(&sem->block)))
return true;
__this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count);
/* Prod writer to re-evaluate readers_active_check() */
rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer);