forked from Minki/linux
pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
The single pinmux controller can be cascaded to the other interrupt controllers. Hence when propagating wake-up settings to its parent interrupt controller, there's possiblity of detecting possible recursive locking and getting lockdep warning. This patch avoids this false positive by using a separate lockdep class for this single pinctrl interrupts. Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96851d391d
commit
3c177a1662
@ -254,6 +254,13 @@ static enum pin_config_param pcs_bias[] = {
|
||||
PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This lock class tells lockdep that irqchip core that this single
|
||||
* pinctrl can be in a different category than its parents, so it won't
|
||||
* report false recursion.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct lock_class_key pcs_lock_class;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* REVISIT: Reads and writes could eventually use regmap or something
|
||||
* generic. But at least on omaps, some mux registers are performance
|
||||
@ -1713,6 +1720,7 @@ static int pcs_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
|
||||
irq_set_chip_data(irq, pcs_soc);
|
||||
irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &pcs->chip,
|
||||
handle_level_irq);
|
||||
irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, &pcs_lock_class);
|
||||
irq_set_noprobe(irq);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user