cifs: clean up checkSMB
The variable names in this function are so ambiguous that it's very difficult to know what it's doing. Rename them to make it a bit more clear. Also, remove a redundant length check. cifsd checks to make sure that the rfclen isn't larger than the maximum frame size when it does the receive. Finally, change checkSMB to return a real error code (-EIO) when it finds an error. That will help simplify some coming changes in the callers. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c974befa40
commit
376b43f41c
@ -420,19 +420,22 @@ check_smb_hdr(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
checkSMB(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid, unsigned int length)
|
||||
checkSMB(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid, unsigned int total_read)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__u32 len = be32_to_cpu(smb->smb_buf_length);
|
||||
__u32 rfclen = be32_to_cpu(smb->smb_buf_length);
|
||||
__u32 clc_len; /* calculated length */
|
||||
cFYI(0, "checkSMB Length: 0x%x, smb_buf_length: 0x%x", length, len);
|
||||
cFYI(0, "checkSMB Length: 0x%x, smb_buf_length: 0x%x",
|
||||
total_read, rfclen);
|
||||
|
||||
if (length < 2 + sizeof(struct smb_hdr)) {
|
||||
if ((length >= sizeof(struct smb_hdr) - 1)
|
||||
/* is this frame too small to even get to a BCC? */
|
||||
if (total_read < 2 + sizeof(struct smb_hdr)) {
|
||||
if ((total_read >= sizeof(struct smb_hdr) - 1)
|
||||
&& (smb->Status.CifsError != 0)) {
|
||||
/* it's an error return */
|
||||
smb->WordCount = 0;
|
||||
/* some error cases do not return wct and bcc */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
} else if ((length == sizeof(struct smb_hdr) + 1) &&
|
||||
} else if ((total_read == sizeof(struct smb_hdr) + 1) &&
|
||||
(smb->WordCount == 0)) {
|
||||
char *tmp = (char *)smb;
|
||||
/* Need to work around a bug in two servers here */
|
||||
@ -452,39 +455,35 @@ checkSMB(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid, unsigned int length)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cERROR(1, "Length less than smb header size");
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (len > CIFSMaxBufSize + MAX_CIFS_HDR_SIZE - 4) {
|
||||
cERROR(1, "smb length greater than MaxBufSize, mid=%d",
|
||||
smb->Mid);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* otherwise, there is enough to get to the BCC */
|
||||
if (check_smb_hdr(smb, mid))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
clc_len = smbCalcSize(smb);
|
||||
|
||||
if (4 + len != length) {
|
||||
if (4 + rfclen != total_read) {
|
||||
cERROR(1, "Length read does not match RFC1001 length %d",
|
||||
len);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
rfclen);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (4 + len != clc_len) {
|
||||
if (4 + rfclen != clc_len) {
|
||||
/* check if bcc wrapped around for large read responses */
|
||||
if ((len > 64 * 1024) && (len > clc_len)) {
|
||||
if ((rfclen > 64 * 1024) && (rfclen > clc_len)) {
|
||||
/* check if lengths match mod 64K */
|
||||
if (((4 + len) & 0xFFFF) == (clc_len & 0xFFFF))
|
||||
if (((4 + rfclen) & 0xFFFF) == (clc_len & 0xFFFF))
|
||||
return 0; /* bcc wrapped */
|
||||
}
|
||||
cFYI(1, "Calculated size %u vs length %u mismatch for mid=%u",
|
||||
clc_len, 4 + len, smb->Mid);
|
||||
clc_len, 4 + rfclen, smb->Mid);
|
||||
|
||||
if (4 + len < clc_len) {
|
||||
if (4 + rfclen < clc_len) {
|
||||
cERROR(1, "RFC1001 size %u smaller than SMB for mid=%u",
|
||||
len, smb->Mid);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else if (len > clc_len + 512) {
|
||||
rfclen, smb->Mid);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
} else if (rfclen > clc_len + 512) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Some servers (Windows XP in particular) send more
|
||||
* data than the lengths in the SMB packet would
|
||||
@ -495,8 +494,8 @@ checkSMB(struct smb_hdr *smb, __u16 mid, unsigned int length)
|
||||
* data to 512 bytes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cERROR(1, "RFC1001 size %u more than 512 bytes larger "
|
||||
"than SMB for mid=%u", len, smb->Mid);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
"than SMB for mid=%u", rfclen, smb->Mid);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user